HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032372.jpg
Extraction Summary
8
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
Summary
An email thread from November 14, 2016, shortly after the US Presidential election, between NYT financial reporter Landon Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey Epstein. They discuss Donald Trump's cabinet appointments, specifically the Treasury (Mnuchin) and the sidelining of Chris Christie. Epstein comments that Trump has 'ZERO' loyalty, while Thomas notes that hedge fund managers ('hedgies') are profiting from the 'Trump trade' despite previously supporting Hillary Clinton.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Landon Thomas Jr. | Financial Reporter, New York Times |
Sender of the latest email, asking Epstein for intel and opinions on the Trump transition team.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Recipient/Sender |
Using email alias 'jeffrey E.' and 'jeevacation@gmail.com'. Providing commentary on Trump's loyalty and appointments.
|
| Donald Trump | President-Elect (Subject of discussion) |
Discussed regarding his cabinet picks and loyalty to associates.
|
| Chris Christie | Politician |
Epstein notes Trump 'tossed christie after being his best friend' and has zero loyalty.
|
| Steven Mnuchin | Potential Cabinet Member |
Mentioned by Thomas as a potential Treasury pick.
|
| Reince Priebus | Political Figure |
Mentioned regarding the 'Priebus choice'.
|
| Hillary Clinton | Former Presidential Candidate |
Mentioned in phrase 'Hillary loving hedgies'.
|
| Ronald Reagan | Former President |
Mentioned as a comparison ('Reagan 2.0').
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| New York Times |
Employer of Landon Thomas Jr.
|
|
| Treasury |
US Department of the Treasury (cabinet position discussion).
|
|
| JEE |
Mentioned in the confidentiality footer (likely J. Epstein Enterprises).
|
Relationships (2)
Thomas asks Epstein for 'intel' and confirmation of his thesis; references advice Epstein gave 'months ago'.
Epstein claims Trump 'tossed christie after being his best friend'.
Key Quotes (4)
"he has no loyalty ZERO tossed christie after being his best friend. in four seconds flat"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032372.jpg
Quote #1
"no intel but lots of profits"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032372.jpg
Quote #2
"The Trump trade certainly seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032372.jpg
Quote #3
"everything he has done so far suggests to me he is going to do what you told me months ago: appoint competent people beneath him who he trusts AND who will not fuck things up."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032372.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,040 characters)
From: Thomas Jr., Landon [REDACTED]
Sent: 11/14/2016 2:59:28 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Trump
Sent: 11/14/2016 2:59:28 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Trump
Importance: High
yeah, but that was a smart move -- made him look presidential. everything he has done so far suggests to me he is going to do what you told me months ago: appoint competent people beneath him who he trusts AND who will not fuck things up. Christie was not one of those people.
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:56 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
no, they dont have many loyal people that have gravitas. . it will be somewhat random but he is being advised to do as you suggest but he doesnt like advice in general. he has no loyalty ZERO tossed christie after being his best friend. in four seconds flat
no, they dont have many loyal people that have gravitas. . it will be somewhat random but he is being advised to do as you suggest but he doesnt like advice in general. he has no loyalty ZERO tossed christie after being his best friend. in four seconds flat
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon [REDACTED] wrote:
do you agree with my thesis?
do you agree with my thesis?
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:53 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
no intel but lots of profits
no intel but lots of profits
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon [REDACTED] wrote:
Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as some are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!
Any further intel on Treasury? Priebus choice suggests to me that he may go for a bigger name in treasury than Mnuchin. Someone to underscore/push forward this notion that he is Reagan 2.0 (as some are suggesting). I am just not sure who that person would be. The Trump trade certainly seems to have legs -- all the Hillary loving hedgies I am talking to are congratulating themselves for making so much money last week. They are all Trump lovers now!
--
Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times
[REDACTED]
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_jr_thomas/index.html
Landon Thomas, Jr.
Financial Reporter
New York Times
[REDACTED]
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/t/landon_jr_thomas/index.html
--
please note
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
please note
The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE
Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_032372
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document