This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the direct examination of a witness named Loftus by attorney Ms. Sternheim. The questioning concerns psychological concepts of memory, specifically the "forgetting curve" and "post-event information." Opposing counsel, Ms. Pomerantz, successfully objects to the line of questioning multiple times, with the court sustaining the objections and instructing the witness.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. POMERANTZ | Attorney |
Appears as an attorney making objections during a court proceeding.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, ruling on objections and instructing the jury and witness.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Appears as an attorney conducting a direct examination of a witness.
|
| THE WITNESS | Witness |
An individual being questioned by Ms. Sternheim about memory concepts.
|
| Loftus | Witness |
Identified in the header as the subject of the direct examination, likely the witness.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
"Objection, your Honor."Source
"Jury will disregard the witness's last comment. The witness will just direct her answers to the questions posed."Source
"Going back again to the concept of post-event information, you spoke before about post-event suggestion. What would that be?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,219 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document