DOJ-OGR-00021065.jpg
292 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
292 KB
Summary
This legal document, dated February 28, 2023, is part of a court case (22-1426) and questions the legal basis of a sentence imposed by the District Court. The document raises two key issues: whether the sentence was based on a miscalculated guideline range without proper explanation for an upward variance, and whether the court erred in applying an aggravating role adjustment for supervising another criminal participant without sufficient evidence.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Defendant | Defendant |
The subject of a sentencing by the District Court, who allegedly supervised another criminal participant.
|
| another criminal participant | Criminal participant |
An individual allegedly supervised by the Defendant, which led to an aggravating role adjustment in the Defendant's s...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| District Court | Judicial / Government Agency |
The court whose sentence is being questioned for miscalculation, lack of explanation for an upward variance, and erro...
|
Timeline (1 events)
The District Court imposed a sentence on a Defendant that is being challenged on the grounds of miscalculation and improper application of an aggravating role adjustment.
Relationships (1)
The document questions the finding that the 'Defendant supervised another criminal participant,' which was the basis for an aggravating role adjustment in sentencing.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (470 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 59, 02/28/2023, 3475902, Page18 of 113
5. Whether the District Court’s sentence was based on a miscalculation of the guideline range that resulted in the imposition of an upward variance in the absence of providing the required explanation, and whether the District Court erred in applying the aggravating role adjustment when there was no evidence to support a finding that Defendant supervised another criminal participant.
3
DOJ-OGR-00021065
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document