DOJ-OGR-00001637.jpg

835 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 835 KB
Summary

This legal document, dated July 21, 2020, is a filing on behalf of Ms. Maxwell arguing that recent public statements by the government have been prejudicial to her right to a fair trial. It specifically cites a press conference held by Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss on July 2, 2020, following Maxwell's arrest, quoting her statements from the New York Law Journal and the Washington Post as evidence of improper commentary on Maxwell's credibility and guilt.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Alison J. Nathan The Honorable
The document is addressed to 'The Honorable Alison J. Nathan'.
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
The subject of the legal filing, who was arrested and is being discussed in public statements by the government.
Audrey Strauss Acting U.S. Attorney
Held a press conference after Ms. Maxwell's arrest and made public statements about the case, which are quoted in the...
Epstein Associate of Ms. Maxwell
Mentioned as a co-conspirator with Ms. Maxwell in the alleged crimes.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
Refers to the U.S. Government, which is prosecuting Ms. Maxwell. The document alleges its agents made prejudicial pub...
New York Law Journal media/publication
A publication cited as the source for a quote from Audrey Strauss.
Washington Post media/publication
A publication cited as the source for quotes from Audrey Strauss.

Timeline (2 events)

2020-07-02
Ms. Maxwell was arrested at her residence.
New Hampshire
2020-07-02
Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss held a press conference following Ms. Maxwell's arrest.

Locations (2)

Location Context
Location of Ms. Maxwell's residence where she was arrested.
The jurisdiction where Audrey Strauss is the acting U.S. attorney.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Maxwell co-conspirator Epstein
The document quotes Audrey Strauss stating that Maxwell and Epstein set a 'trap' for minor girls and that Maxwell helped Epstein 'identify, befriend, and groom minor victims for abuse'.
Ms. Maxwell adversarial (defendant/prosecutor) Audrey Strauss
Strauss is the Acting U.S. Attorney prosecuting Maxwell's case. This document is a filing on behalf of Maxwell arguing that Strauss's public statements are prejudicial.

Key Quotes (5)

"Maxwell lied because the truth, as alleged, was almost unspeakable,"
Source
— Audrey Strauss (Quoted from a press conference as reported by the New York Law Journal.)
DOJ-OGR-00001637.jpg
Quote #1
"Maxwell enticed minor girls, got them to trust her and then delivered them into the trap that that she and Epstein had set for them. She pretended to be a woman they could trust, all the while she was setting them up to be sexually abused by Epstein and, in some cases, by Maxwell herself."
Source
— Audrey Strauss (Quoted from a press conference as reported by the New York Law Journal.)
DOJ-OGR-00001637.jpg
Quote #2
"was almost unspeakable."
Source
— Audrey Strauss (Quoted from a deposition as reported by the Washington Post, referring to the truth.)
DOJ-OGR-00001637.jpg
Quote #3
"the prequel"
Source
— Audrey Strauss (Quoted by the Washington Post, describing the sex abuse in the Maxwell case in relation to the charges against Epstein.)
DOJ-OGR-00001637.jpg
Quote #4
"Maxwell played a critical role in helping Epstein to identify, befriend, and groom minor victims for abuse’ … ‘In some cases Maxwell participated in the abuse itself."
Source
— Audrey Strauss (Quoted as reported in the Washington Post.)
DOJ-OGR-00001637.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,448 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 27 Filed 07/21/20 Page 3 of 7
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
July 21, 2020
Page 3
Recent Prejudicial Public Statements by the Government, its Agents and Counsel to Prospective Witnesses
Recent public statements by the Government, its agents and counsel for prospective witnesses have included presumptively prejudicial information.
On July 2, 2020 Ms. Maxwell was arrested without notice to her lawyers who had been in active communication with the Government for one year. Because plain vanilla surrenders lack the fanfare and attendant media coverage afforded to secret, armed, raids at dawn, the Government chose to invade Ms. Maxwell’s New Hampshire residence, arrest her, and stage a media presentation that included numerous statements that prejudice Ms. Maxwell’s right to a fair trial.
Immediately following Ms. Maxwell’s arrest, Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss held a press conference in which she commented on Ms. Maxwell’s credibility and her incorrect opinions concerning “guilt or innocence or as to the merits of the case or the evidence in the case” in violation of Local Rule 23.1(d)(1), (4) and (7):
Per the New York Law Journal:
‘Maxwell lied because the truth, as alleged, was almost unspeakable,’ Strauss said at a press conference announcing the charges. ‘Maxwell enticed minor girls, got them to trust her and then delivered them into the trap that that she and Epstein had set for them. She pretended to be a woman they could trust, all the while she was setting them up to be sexually abused by Epstein and, in some cases, by Maxwell herself.’¹
As reported in the Washington Post,
Strauss, the acting U.S. attorney in Manhattan, said the socialite told that lie and others in deposition because the truth ‘was almost unspeakable.’
Acting U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss called the sex abuse described in the Maxwell case ‘the prequel’ to the charges they lodged against Epstein….
Maxwell played a critical role in helping Epstein to identify, befriend, and groom minor victims for abuse’ … ‘In some cases Maxwell participated in the abuse itself.’²
¹ https://www.law.com/newyorklawjournal/2020/07/02/ghislaine-maxwell-arrested-in-connection-with-jeffrey-epstein-sex-trafficking-ring/?slreturn=20200614124921
² https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/ghislaine-maxwell-arrested-jeffrey-epstein/2020/07/02/20c74502-bc69-11ea-8cf5-9c1b8d7f84c6_story.html
DOJ-OGR-00001637

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document