DOJ-OGR-00011617.jpg
571 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
571 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a court proceeding on July 22, 2022, concerning the sentencing of Ms. Maxwell. Her counsel, Ms. Sternheim, argues that Ms. Maxwell cannot pay a fine because a bequest she was to receive is 'unactualized' and she has received no money from it. The Court acknowledges she hasn't received the bequest but determines that other 'additional assets' make her able to pay the fine, and subsequently imposes the sentence.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Counsel |
Speaker in the court transcript, addresses the Honor.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Counsel |
Speaker in the court transcript, makes a statement on behalf of Ms. Maxwell regarding a fine and a bequest.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the court proceeding. Her financial status, specifically a bequest and a fine, is being discussed. The Cou...
|
| Judge | Judge |
Referred to as 'Your Honor' and 'Judge', and speaks as 'THE COURT'. Presides over the hearing, makes findings, and im...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Government Agency |
The judicial body presiding over the case, which indicated a bequest, made findings about Ms. Maxwell's ability to pa...
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-07-22
A court hearing where counsel and the judge discuss the defendant's (Ms. Maxwell) ability to pay a fine in relation to an 'unactualized bequest', culminating in the judge imposing the sentence.
Courtroom in the Southern District
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
Relationships (2)
Ms. Sternheim is acting as legal counsel for Ms. Maxwell, making arguments to the court on her behalf regarding her financial situation and sentence.
Ms. Sternheim addresses the Judge as 'Your Honor' and 'Judge' while presenting legal arguments in a formal court proceeding.
Key Quotes (3)
"I just want the record to reflect that that is an unactualized bequest, as Ms. Maxwell has received nothing, and it is the expectation that she will receive nothing."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Arguing to the court that Ms. Maxwell's financial ability to pay a fine is limited because a bequest mentioned by the court has not been and is not expected to be received.)
DOJ-OGR-00011617.jpg
Quote #1
"I am not finding and accept that she hasn't received anything, but there have only been nonspecific claims that she won't receive anything and there are additional assets that lead me to the conclusion that she is able to pay the fine."Source
— THE COURT
(Responding to Ms. Sternheim's argument, explaining the reasoning for determining Ms. Maxwell can pay the fine despite the status of the bequest.)
DOJ-OGR-00011617.jpg
Quote #2
"The sentence as stated is imposed."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's final declaration, officially enacting the sentence that had been discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00011617.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,354 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 98 of 101
M6s2Max2
M6s2Max2
MS. MOE: No, your Honor.
MS. STERNHEIM: Your Honor, I would just like to make one statement, if I may. With regard to the fine, the Court indicated the bequest in the will. I just want the record to reflect that that is an unactualized bequest, as Ms. Maxwell has received nothing, and it is the expectation that she will receive nothing.
THE COURT: I understand. And to be clear, I am not finding and accept that she hasn't received anything, but there have only been nonspecific claims that she won't receive anything and there are additional assets that lead me to the conclusion that she is able to pay the fine.
MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you, Judge.
THE COURT: Thank you.
And just to confirm, Ms. Sternheim, any legal reason why the sentence should not be imposed as stated other than what already was argued?
MS. STERNHEIM: No, your Honor, but I do have requests for recommendation.
THE COURT: I will get there. Thank you.
The sentence as stated is imposed. I do find the sentence is sufficient but not greater than necessary to satisfy the sentencing purposes that I described earlier.
Ms. Maxwell, when you are released and on supervised release, you will have the guidance and support of the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
•
•
•
(212) 805-0300
•
•
•
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011617
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document