DOJ-OGR-00017000.jpg
563 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
563 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion about jury instructions. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, proposes an instruction regarding the credibility of a witness with a prior felony conviction, citing the case 'United States v. Berry' as a model. The opposing counsel, Mr. Rohrbach, requests time to review this new proposal, which the Court grants, suggesting the instruction be added as a standalone item.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaking to the court, requesting a jury instruction based on a model from a previous case.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the case, responding to attorneys' proposals regarding jury instructions.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney |
Speaking to the court, requesting time to review a new proposal from Mr. Everdell.
|
| Berry |
Mentioned as a party in the case name "United States v. Berry".
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
| United States | government agency |
Mentioned as a party in the case name "United States v. Berry".
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Attorneys and the judge discuss a proposed jury instruction regarding the credibility of a witness with a prior felony conviction.
Courtroom in the Southern District
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the name of the court reporting agency, indicating the location of the court.
|
Relationships (3)
Both are attorneys addressing the court, seemingly on opposing sides of a legal matter, as one makes a proposal and the other requests time to consider it.
Mr. Everdell is an attorney making a request to the judge (The Court) during a legal proceeding.
Mr. Rohrbach is an attorney making a request to the judge (The Court) during a legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (3)
"I think we've been using that as a model in this charge, your Honor, so we would request a similar instruction here."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Requesting a jury instruction based on a precedent set in the 'United States v. Berry' case.)
DOJ-OGR-00017000.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, this is the first we've hoard of this proposal. So if we could have a few hours after the charge conference to give it some thought."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Responding to Mr. Everdell's proposal and requesting time to review it.)
DOJ-OGR-00017000.jpg
Quote #2
"I think that's fair, and I will look too since it's a new suggestion. I think my proposal would be to just do it as a standalone instruction at, maybe what would be 45-A?"Source
— THE COURT
(Agreeing to Mr. Rohrbach's request for time and suggesting how to implement the proposed instruction.)
DOJ-OGR-00017000.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,338 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 74 of 95
LCIAMAX2ps
2812
LCIAMAX2ps
2812
testimony of witnesses who were previously convicted of crimes
punishable by more than one year in jail. This prior
conviction was put into evidence for you to consider in
evaluating the witness's credibility. You may consider the
fact that the witness who testified was a convicted felon in
deciding how much of his testimony to accept and what weight if
any it should be given." Looks like I gave that in my -- in
the United States v. Berry.
punishable by more than one year in jail. This prior
conviction was put into evidence for you to consider in
evaluating the witness's credibility. You may consider the
fact that the witness who testified was a convicted felon in
deciding how much of his testimony to accept and what weight if
any it should be given." Looks like I gave that in my -- in
the United States v. Berry.
MR. EVERDELL: I think we've been using that as a
model in this charge, your Honor, so we would request a similar
instruction here.
model in this charge, your Honor, so we would request a similar
instruction here.
THE COURT: I would add it, as I did in that last
case, as a standalone instruction.
case, as a standalone instruction.
Mr. Rohrbach.
MR. ROHRBACH: Your Honor, this is the first we've
hoard of this proposal. So if we could have a few hours after
the charge conference to give it some thought. We can file a
letter saying either, we agree, or, if we have objections to
it, articulating those.
hoard of this proposal. So if we could have a few hours after
the charge conference to give it some thought. We can file a
letter saying either, we agree, or, if we have objections to
it, articulating those.
THE COURT: I think that's fair, and I will look too
since it's a new suggestion. I think my proposal would be to
just do it as a standalone instruction at, maybe what would be
45-A?
since it's a new suggestion. I think my proposal would be to
just do it as a standalone instruction at, maybe what would be
45-A?
MR. EVERDELL: That's fine, your Honor.
THE COURT: Between 45 and '6.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017000
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document