DOJ-OGR-00011649.jpg
575 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
575 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a discussion between the judge and attorneys regarding procedural matters. The court affirms that defense experts are precluded from testifying without providing specific notice as required by Rule 16. The conversation then shifts to a specific limiting instruction for the jury, which states that the defendant cannot be convicted based on testimony about sexual conduct between 'witness 3' and 'Mr. Epstein'.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the case, speaking with attorneys about procedural matters and jury instructions.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
An attorney speaking on behalf of the government, discussing expert witnesses and agreeing to a proposed jury instruc...
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
An attorney who speaks to agree with the court's ruling on expert witness notice.
|
| Mr. Epstein |
Mentioned in a proposed jury instruction regarding testimony about sexual conduct between him and an unnamed witness.
|
|
| witness 3 | Witness |
An unnamed witness whose testimony about sexual conduct with Mr. Epstein is the subject of a limiting instruction for...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Appears in the footer of the document, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion in court regarding the necessity for defense experts to provide specific notice before testifying and the agreement on a limiting jury instruction concerning testimony about Mr. Epstein.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (3)
Mr. Rohrbach addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and they engage in a formal discussion about legal procedure.
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and states he understands the Court's ruling.
The document discusses testimony regarding 'sexual conduct between this witness and Mr. Epstein'.
Key Quotes (1)
"However, you may not convict the defendant on the basis of the testimony regarding the sexual conduct between this witness and Mr. Epstein."Source
— THE COURT
(The Court is quoting a suggested limiting instruction for the jury and asking Mr. Rohrbach to confirm it is a correct statement of the law.)
DOJ-OGR-00011649.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,419 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 739 Filed 08/10/22 Page 28 of 43 28
LBNAMAXTps
LBNAMAXTps
1 appropriate Daubert motion, identify responsive experts if
2 necessary. And so the government asks that the Court preclude
3 the defense experts at this time unless they give at least more
4 specific notice about what they might testify to.
5 THE COURT: Well, they are precluded without more
6 specific notice. That's true.
7 MR. ROHRBACH: OK. Then that's fine for the
8 government, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: Yes. I mean, plainly, Rule 16 hasn't been
10 met at this stage, and the representation is, they're not
11 anticipating anything coming up. If something comes up, they
12 would have to first provide sufficient notice in order for us
13 to be able to resolve this. So it can't being is that could
14 have been anticipated at this point. OK?
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. Totally understood, your Honor.
16 THE COURT: OK. Thank you.
17 All right. Next thing on my checklist, the limiting
18 instructions related to witness 3 that I proposed. Who's
19 taking this one?
20 MR. ROHRBACH: I am, your Honor.
21 THE COURT: So Mr. Rohrbach, you propose -- so I
22 suggested, "However, you may not convict the defendant on the
23 basis of the testimony regarding the sexual conduct between
24 this witness and Mr. Epstein." You agree that's a correct
25 statement of the law, yes?
2 necessary. And so the government asks that the Court preclude
3 the defense experts at this time unless they give at least more
4 specific notice about what they might testify to.
5 THE COURT: Well, they are precluded without more
6 specific notice. That's true.
7 MR. ROHRBACH: OK. Then that's fine for the
8 government, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: Yes. I mean, plainly, Rule 16 hasn't been
10 met at this stage, and the representation is, they're not
11 anticipating anything coming up. If something comes up, they
12 would have to first provide sufficient notice in order for us
13 to be able to resolve this. So it can't being is that could
14 have been anticipated at this point. OK?
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. Totally understood, your Honor.
16 THE COURT: OK. Thank you.
17 All right. Next thing on my checklist, the limiting
18 instructions related to witness 3 that I proposed. Who's
19 taking this one?
20 MR. ROHRBACH: I am, your Honor.
21 THE COURT: So Mr. Rohrbach, you propose -- so I
22 suggested, "However, you may not convict the defendant on the
23 basis of the testimony regarding the sexual conduct between
24 this witness and Mr. Epstein." You agree that's a correct
25 statement of the law, yes?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011649
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document