This undated report, addressed to Jeffrey (presumed Epstein), details an extensive online reputation management campaign. The author describes successes in manipulating Google search results by suppressing negative articles and 'hacking' Wikipedia to remove pejorative terms and replace his mugshot. The document also outlines financial arrangements with a contractor named Mike and questions whether Jeffrey wishes to continue funding the project.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey | Recipient / Client |
The recipient of the report, presumed to be Jeffrey Epstein, for whom an online reputation management campaign is bei...
|
| Jessica | Content Contributor (unfulfilled) |
Mentioned as someone who failed to provide original content for the 'science and the org site', only providing 'just ...
|
| Mike | Technical Contractor |
Received $2500 for replacement servers and is owed a balance of $7500. The author needs to know if his services will ...
|
| Unnamed Author | Project Manager |
The sender of the report, managing the online reputation campaign for Jeffrey.
|
| daily beast foe | Antagonist |
An unnamed female individual associated with the 'daily beast' who is actively trying to promote sites against Jeffrey.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
|
The search engine whose results are being manipulated as part of the reputation management campaign.
|
||
| Huffington Post |
A media organization with a negative article about Jeffrey that the author is trying to push down in Google search re...
|
|
| daily beast |
A media organization whose negative article was successfully pushed down in search results. An unnamed 'foe' from thi...
|
|
| Wikipedia |
The online encyclopedia where Jeffrey's entry was edited to remove negative information and replace his mug shot. The...
|
|
| Epstein Foundation |
Mentioned as a positive topic ('Philanthropic work, Epstein Foundation, Promotion of Scientists') added to Jeffrey's ...
|
|
| Edge |
A website or project that was successfully promoted to the front page of Google search results.
|
|
| House Oversight |
The document is marked with 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022227', indicating it is part of a collection from the U.S. House Commi...
|
"We hacked the site to replace the mug shot and caption, and now has an entirely different photo and caption. This was a big success."Source
"Wikipedia was an important victory, as it will always be at the top of the search engine results. Now the head lines do not mention convicted sex offender or pedophile."Source
"You paid Mike $2500, which he applied for the purchasing of his replacement servers, but his fee of $7500 balance is now due if you want to continue."Source
"Your daily beast foe is still at it, and trying to promote her sites against you in the same way that we try to depromote you."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,697 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document