DOJ-OGR-00017676.jpg

481 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size: 481 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane' by attorney Ms. Menninger. The defense attorney questions the consistency of Jane's memory regarding her first encounter with Ghislaine Maxwell, suggesting she fabricated a memory recently that she did not possess in December 2019. The dialogue also references a meeting between Jane and the government in February 2020.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Jane Witness
Under cross-examination regarding her memories of Ghislaine Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant (Subject)
Referred to as 'Ghislaine'; the questioning concerns the witness's first involvement with her.
Ms. Menninger Attorney (Defense)
Conducting the cross-examination, challenging the witness's memory consistency.
Ms. Moe Attorney (Prosecution)
Raising objections to the form of questions asked by Ms. Menninger.
The Court Judge
Ruling on objections and managing the proceedings.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
The Government
Mentioned as having met with the witness in February 2020.

Timeline (3 events)

2019-12
Timeframe where the witness allegedly had 'no specific memory' of her first time with Ghislaine.
Unknown
2020-02
Meeting between the witness (Jane) and the government.
Unknown
2022-08-10
Date the document was filed.
Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.

Relationships (2)

Jane Accuser/Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell
Counsel asks about 'first time you were involved with Ghislaine'.
Jane Witness/Prosecution The Government
Witness met with the government in February 2020.

Key Quotes (3)

"Because you have no specific memory of your first time with Ghislaine in December of 2019, you have come up with that memory in the last two years, the one you gave yesterday, correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017676.jpg
Quote #1
"Well, you gave a memory to the jury yesterday that you didn't have in December of 2019, right?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017676.jpg
Quote #2
"And what you told the government in February of 2020 is that the first time you were involved with Ghislaine, there"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00017676.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,133 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 67 of 264 473
LC1Qmax2 Jane - Cross
1 specific --
2 MS. MOE: Objection to form.
3 MS. MENNINGER: That was just admitted. I'm just
4 laying the foundation for the next question. That was the last
5 thing.
6 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I'm not sure what the question
7 is.
8 THE COURT: You don't have a question yet. Go ahead.
9 BY MS. MENNINGER:
10 Q. Because you have no specific memory of your first time with
11 Ghislaine in December of 2019, you have come up with that
12 memory in the last two years, the one you gave yesterday,
13 correct?
14 MS. MOE: Objection to form.
15 THE COURT: Overruled.
16 A. I come up with -- I don't believe I've come up with a
17 memory, no.
18 Q. Well, you gave a memory to the jury yesterday that you
19 didn't have in December of 2019, right?
20 A. I don't recall.
21 Q. You then later met with the government in February of 2020,
22 right?
23 A. Right.
24 Q. And what you told the government in February of 2020 is
25 that the first time you were involved with Ghislaine, there
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017676

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document