This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) documenting the cross-examination of a witness named 'Jane' by attorney Ms. Menninger. The defense attorney questions the consistency of Jane's memory regarding her first encounter with Ghislaine Maxwell, suggesting she fabricated a memory recently that she did not possess in December 2019. The dialogue also references a meeting between Jane and the government in February 2020.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Witness |
Under cross-examination regarding her memories of Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant (Subject) |
Referred to as 'Ghislaine'; the questioning concerns the witness's first involvement with her.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Defense) |
Conducting the cross-examination, challenging the witness's memory consistency.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Raising objections to the form of questions asked by Ms. Menninger.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Ruling on objections and managing the proceedings.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Mentioned as having met with the witness in February 2020.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.
|
"Because you have no specific memory of your first time with Ghislaine in December of 2019, you have come up with that memory in the last two years, the one you gave yesterday, correct?"Source
"Well, you gave a memory to the jury yesterday that you didn't have in December of 2019, right?"Source
"And what you told the government in February of 2020 is that the first time you were involved with Ghislaine, there"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,133 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document