DOJ-OGR-00013488.jpg
506 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
506 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. An attorney questions Rodgers about his certainty regarding the presence of a passenger named "Jane" on a flight, establishing that Rodgers cannot definitively say whether she was on board. Rodgers admits he could have been given a name for the flight manifest without ever meeting the person, and that the person he knows with that name could not have been the passenger in question.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rodgers | Witness |
The person being cross-examined, as indicated by the header "Rodgers - cross" and their answers prefixed with "A."
|
| Jane | Passenger (potential) |
A person being discussed, whose presence on a flight is in question. The name is referred to as a first name only.
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in the context of his "world," suggesting a social or professional circle to which people with the first na...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Relationships (2)
Rodgers discusses the possibility of having flown a passenger named Jane, but is uncertain if he ever met her or if she was on a specific flight. The relationship is that of a potential pilot to a potential passenger.
Key Quotes (3)
"I've only flown two persons with that name, and the second person I saw a picture of I met in September of 2003. So it couldn't have been her."Source
— Rodgers
(Responding to a question about whether he knew if Jane was on a specific flight.)
DOJ-OGR-00013488.jpg
Quote #1
"You could have been given the name of Jane's true first name as a passenger and never met that person; correct?"Source
— Unnamed Questioner
(Posing a hypothetical scenario to the witness about how a name could appear on a flight manifest without the witness having met the individual.)
DOJ-OGR-00013488.jpg
Quote #2
"Possibly."Source
— Rodgers
(Answering whether it's possible he might not have met the person on the flight who was actually going by Jane's true first name.)
DOJ-OGR-00013488.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,244 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 210 of 262 1921
LC8Cmax7 Rodgers - cross
LC8Cmax7 Rodgers - cross
1 A. Yes.
2 Q. Just to be clear, that's just her first name, not her last
3 name; right?
4 A. Correct.
5 Q. So, bottom line is, you don't know, sitting here today,
6 whether Jane was actually on that flight; right?
7 A. I've only flown two persons with that name, and the second
8 person I saw a picture of I met in September of 2003. So it
9 couldn't have been her.
10 Q. All right. But there were potentially lots of people in
11 Epstein's world who had that same first name that you never
12 met; correct?
13 A. Well, there could be.
14 Q. You could have been given the name of Jane's true first
15 name as a passenger and never met that person; correct?
16 A. Say that again.
17 Q. Well, when you're filling out the manifest, you could have
18 been given the names of some of the passengers; right?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. And you may have been given that first name, that's Jane's
21 true first name; correct?
22 A. Yes.
23 Q. And you might not have met the person on the flight who was
24 actually going by Jane's true first name; correct?
25 A. Possibly.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013488
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document