EFTA00035542.pdf

39.1 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email thread
File Size: 39.1 KB
Summary

This is an email chain from July 24, 2019, discussing Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondence appears to be between staff members (likely at the correctional facility where Epstein was held) complaining about a supervisor. The emails mention an 'SRA from yesterday' (likely Suicide Risk Assessment, coinciding with Epstein's July 23rd incident) and a staff member's fear of losing her license if she has to testify about it. There is also mention of another staff member claiming not to recall the incident.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Subject of email
Mentioned in the earliest email in the thread regarding information sent about him.
[Redacted] (Sender) Sender
Employee complaining about a supervisor's inefficiency and discussing potential disciplinary issues.
[Redacted] (Recipient) Recipient
Employee receiving complaints.
"She" / The Boss Supervisor/Medical Staff
Person being discussed. Allegedly afraid to delegate, afraid of losing her license if called to testify about an 'SRA...
"He" Staff Member
Claims he 'doesn't recall the incident'; question of his competence raised.
K2 Colleague/Observer
Has noticed the supervisor's inefficient email habits; mentioned as making a 'smart move'.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
K2
Referred to as an entity or person ('K2 has noticed it', 'smart move of K2'). Potentially refers to a shift, a unit, ...

Timeline (2 events)

2019-07-23
SRA (Likely Suicide Risk Assessment) incident
Implied Prison/Correctional Facility
Jeffrey Epstein Unnamed Staff Member ('She')
2019-07-24
Discussions regarding disciplinary reports and competence
Unknown
Email Sender Email Recipient

Relationships (2)

Sender Colleagues Recipient
Casual email conversation complaining about a boss.
Sender Subordinate/Supervisor "She" (Boss)
Sender asks 'shouldn't this be her job as boss?'

Key Quotes (4)

"look what i just sent you about epstein"
Source
EFTA00035542.pdf
Quote #1
"shouldn't this be her job as boss?"
Source
EFTA00035542.pdf
Quote #2
"she said she will get torn up on the stand and lose her license if called in to testify about her SRA from yesterday and a disciplinary report."
Source
EFTA00035542.pdf
Quote #3
"he claims he doesn't recall the incident."
Source
EFTA00035542.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,537 characters)

From: "[Redacted]>
To: "[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: grapes
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:05:44 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: TEXT.htm
not even just the ineffectiveness of not sending the e-mail herself, but she's obvi avoiding delegating to [Redacted] b/c she's scared to tell her. [Redacted] just declined to do it. saying she doesn't know if he was competent b/c he claims he doesn't recall the incident. she said she will get torn up on the stand and lose her license if called in to testify about her SRA from yesterday and a disciplinary report. so [Redacted] then told me again to do it. anyway, looks like he would need it b/c he's not a CC3 or a study so [Redacted] said she just replied to It. [Redacted] saying he's competent and that should be sufficient. smart move of K2
>>> [Redacted]/24/2019 8:00 AM >>>
yeah, she does stuff like that all the time. it's so annoying. i just ignore her. she doesn't seem to get how inefficient it is to send an email to someone to tell them to send an email to someone else lol. makes no sense. even K2 has noticed it, and told me how [Redacted] always sends her all these unnecessary emails, and how she has started to try to email her first, letting her know she already received things or already knows things, so that [Redacted] doesn't have to tell her again or forward her emails she already has lol
>>> [Redacted] 7/24/2019 7:57 AM >>>
look what i just sent you about epstein - why does [Redacted] tell me to send it to [Redacted]? shouldn't this be her job as boss?
EFTA00035542

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document