DOJ-OGR-00001065.jpg
645 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
645 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript in which an attorney refutes the government's allegations about their client's finances. The attorney argues the government has exaggerated the number of bank accounts, explains a $500,000 transfer as a maturing bond, and attributes another large transfer to the financial fallout their client experienced after Mr. Epstein's arrest.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by the speaker during a court proceeding.
|
| Mr. Epstein |
Mentioned in relation to his arrest, which reportedly had effects on the speaker's client.
|
|
| Unnamed Client | Client |
The subject of the legal proceeding, referred to as 'she' and 'our client'. The government alleges she has 15 bank ac...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the government | Government agency |
The opposing party in the legal case, making allegations about the client's finances.
|
| the court | Judicial body |
The venue for the legal proceedings.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting service that created the transcript.
|
Timeline (2 events)
The arrest of Mr. Epstein, which is stated to have had effects on the speaker's client, including being dropped by her bank.
June and July of 2019
A transfer of several hundred thousand dollars was made from the client's account.
Relationships (2)
The speaker refers to the individual as 'our client' and is defending her in court.
The document states that Mr. Epstein's arrest had 'all kinds of effects on our client'.
Key Quotes (1)
"When Mr. Epstein was arrested, it had all kinds of effects on our client, one of which was that the bank in question referenced in the government's submission dropped her."Source
— Unnamed speaker (attorney)
(Explaining the circumstances surrounding a large financial transfer and the client's banking relationships.)
DOJ-OGR-00001065.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,634 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page124 of 200
61
k7e2MaxC kjc
61
k7e2MaxC kjc
The government also says, well, she has 15 different
bank accounts -- and here we get some hedging language -- that
are by or associated with her. No detail, no explanation to
the court, just more dirt. Well, she has three bank accounts
that she disclosed. She believes that there are more, for
example, with respect to the not-for-profit that she ran for
almost a decade before she was forced to shut it down because
of the issues in the media and the attention and the firestorm.
So it is some number less. And if it's important to the court,
we will do our best to pull it together. But under the
relevant cases, it doesn't change the analysis.
bank accounts -- and here we get some hedging language -- that
are by or associated with her. No detail, no explanation to
the court, just more dirt. Well, she has three bank accounts
that she disclosed. She believes that there are more, for
example, with respect to the not-for-profit that she ran for
almost a decade before she was forced to shut it down because
of the issues in the media and the attention and the firestorm.
So it is some number less. And if it's important to the court,
we will do our best to pull it together. But under the
relevant cases, it doesn't change the analysis.
And then we go through the last one, your Honor. They
say in their brief that she did transfers of funds. One was a
transfer of 500,000. We believe that what that is was a bond
maturing. So when a bond matures, it is transferred out.
say in their brief that she did transfers of funds. One was a
transfer of 500,000. We believe that what that is was a bond
maturing. So when a bond matures, it is transferred out.
And then there was another one, and the government
sort of changes its mind between its opening brief and its
reply brief and I'm sure by tomorrow they will have some new
speculation for your Honor, but essentially let's call it a
several hundred thousand transfer out of and account in June
and July of 2019. What's that refer to? It refers to one of
the themes we have been talking about in our submission and
today your Honor. When Mr. Epstein was arrested, it had all
kinds of effects on our client, one of which was that the bank
in question referenced in the government's submission dropped
her.
sort of changes its mind between its opening brief and its
reply brief and I'm sure by tomorrow they will have some new
speculation for your Honor, but essentially let's call it a
several hundred thousand transfer out of and account in June
and July of 2019. What's that refer to? It refers to one of
the themes we have been talking about in our submission and
today your Honor. When Mr. Epstein was arrested, it had all
kinds of effects on our client, one of which was that the bank
in question referenced in the government's submission dropped
her.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001065
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document