DOJ-OGR-00021988.jpg
598 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
598 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on December 19, 2019, in case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. An attorney argues that their female client, who is presumed innocent, should not be deprived of her constitutional right to possess a firearm during the pretrial period, asserting she is not a threat and requesting individualized consideration. The judge concludes the argument by stating they will next hear from the government.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by an unnamed speaker, presumably an attorney, during a court proceeding.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Identified as the speaker who states, "I'll hear from the government."
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| pretrial services | government agency |
Mentioned as a group whose personnel might visit the defendant's home.
|
| the government | government agency |
Mentioned as the party the court will hear from next, likely the prosecution.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, indicating they are the court reporters who transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-12-19
A court hearing regarding a defendant's right to possess a firearm during the pretrial phase of case 1:19-cr-00830-AT.
Courtroom
Relationships (2)
Unnamed Speaker
→
professional
→
Unnamed female client ('she')
The speaker, likely an attorney, is advocating in court on behalf of their client ('she') regarding her rights.
The speaker addresses the judge as 'your Honor' and presents legal arguments for the judge's consideration.
Key Quotes (4)
"There is no actual, credible, competent threat supported by evidence to suggest that at this time her constitutional right to possess her weapon should be infringed at this time."Source
— Unnamed Speaker
(Arguing on behalf of a client's right to keep her firearm during the pretrial period.)
DOJ-OGR-00021988.jpg
Quote #1
"She remains innocent as we sit here today, and the fact that she's here is disappointing, but we're here, so we have to deal with it."Source
— Unnamed Speaker
(Emphasizing the client's presumption of innocence in the argument against restricting her rights.)
DOJ-OGR-00021988.jpg
Quote #2
"All I'm asking for is fair consideration in an individualized way."Source
— Unnamed Speaker
(Requesting the judge to assess the client's specific circumstances rather than applying a blanket rule.)
DOJ-OGR-00021988.jpg
Quote #3
"I'll hear from the government."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's response after hearing the argument, indicating the prosecution will speak next.)
DOJ-OGR-00021988.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,517 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 17 Filed 12/19/19 Page 12 of 15
JbpWnoeC
JbpWnoeC
1 the dog away. What I'm suggesting to your Honor in the least
2 restrictive manner is that we can make sure that if anyone from
3 pretrial services comes to the home, that she will secure the
4 gun away so that it's not out, since that seems to be their
5 concern.
6 She doesn't have any ill will towards the court staff
7 or anyone a part of this process. She understands what she
8 needs to do. There is no actual, credible, competent threat
9 supported by evidence to suggest that at this time her
10 constitutional right to possess her weapon should be infringed
11 at this time.
12 I suppose there could come a time where that could
13 change, but when we take it now, without an individual
14 assessment of her particulars, her background, the specific
15 circumstances of the case, then it gives the impression as if
16 the conclusion's foregone that she should be -- meaning in this
17 case -- a felon deprived of her firearm. She's not. She
18 remains innocent as we sit here today, and the fact that she's
19 here is disappointing, but we're here, so we have to deal with
20 it.
21 All I'm asking for is fair consideration in an
22 individualized way. Any concern that your Honor has about her
23 possessing a firearm, I'd welcome you to address it with me so
24 I have an opportunity to directly speak to your concerns.
25 THE COURT: I'll hear from the government.
2 restrictive manner is that we can make sure that if anyone from
3 pretrial services comes to the home, that she will secure the
4 gun away so that it's not out, since that seems to be their
5 concern.
6 She doesn't have any ill will towards the court staff
7 or anyone a part of this process. She understands what she
8 needs to do. There is no actual, credible, competent threat
9 supported by evidence to suggest that at this time her
10 constitutional right to possess her weapon should be infringed
11 at this time.
12 I suppose there could come a time where that could
13 change, but when we take it now, without an individual
14 assessment of her particulars, her background, the specific
15 circumstances of the case, then it gives the impression as if
16 the conclusion's foregone that she should be -- meaning in this
17 case -- a felon deprived of her firearm. She's not. She
18 remains innocent as we sit here today, and the fact that she's
19 here is disappointing, but we're here, so we have to deal with
20 it.
21 All I'm asking for is fair consideration in an
22 individualized way. Any concern that your Honor has about her
23 possessing a firearm, I'd welcome you to address it with me so
24 I have an opportunity to directly speak to your concerns.
25 THE COURT: I'll hear from the government.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021988
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document