DOJ-OGR-00018991.jpg
528 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
528 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between the judge, defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca, and government attorney Ms. Comey. The discussion centers on the procedural issue of raising a new argument that was not addressed during a witness's examination, specifically in relation to the testimony of Mr. Alessi. The judge explains their position while affirming they will keep an open mind to future arguments from both sides before the court goes into recess.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the case.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney (Defense) |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court on behalf of the defense.
|
| Mr. Alessi | Witness |
Mentioned in the context of his prior testimony.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney (Government) |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court on behalf of the government.
|
| Rodgers | Witness |
Mentioned in the header of the transcript page, indicating the context of the testimony is a direct examination of Ro...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A colloquy between the judge and counsel for the defense and government regarding the introduction of a new argument. The hearing concludes with a recess.
Courtroom
The court proceeding took a recess.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (3)
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' and engages in legal discussion.
Ms. Comey addresses the judge as 'Your Honor' and speaks on behalf of the government.
They represent opposing sides in the legal case, the 'defense' and the 'government' respectively.
Key Quotes (4)
"Having not admitted it pending what all along had been the government's proffer as to the anticipated testimony of an anticipated witness, I didn't admit it following Mr. Alessi's testimony."Source
— THE COURT
(Explaining the reasoning for not admitting a particular argument or piece of evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018991.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm open to arguments. Obviously, both sides have reargued many issues and I keep an open mind."Source
— THE COURT
(Stating their willingness to hear further arguments from both the prosecution and defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00018991.jpg
Quote #2
"Not from the government, your Honor."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Responding to the judge's question 'Anything else?')
DOJ-OGR-00018991.jpg
Quote #3
"Nothing from the defense, your Honor."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Responding to the judge's question 'Anything else?')
DOJ-OGR-00018991.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,370 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 129 of 262 1834
LC8Cmax5
LC8Cmax5
1 THE COURT: I'll consider it after you confer, but you
2 know where it was. And that's all I have.
3 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, on that point, I'm assuming
4 what the Court means is if there is a new issue raised that
5 wasn't raised during the examination is the problem. Is that
6 what the Court is alluding to?
7 THE COURT: Having not admitted it pending what all
8 along had been the government's proffer as to the anticipated
9 testimony of an anticipated witness, I didn't admit it
10 following Mr. Alessi's testimony. It's true that there was
11 voir dire on it, but I don't know what new argument will be
12 asserted, and it strikes me that the fact that it -- whatever
13 argument is being made in the absence of the witness could be
14 an issue.
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: Right. That's what I understand. That
16 was my understanding. I get it.
17 THE COURT: I'm open to arguments. Obviously, both
18 sides have reargued many issues and I keep an open mind.
19 Anything else?
20 MS. COMEY: Not from the government, your Honor.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: Nothing from the defense, your Honor.
22 (Recess)
23
24
25
2 know where it was. And that's all I have.
3 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, on that point, I'm assuming
4 what the Court means is if there is a new issue raised that
5 wasn't raised during the examination is the problem. Is that
6 what the Court is alluding to?
7 THE COURT: Having not admitted it pending what all
8 along had been the government's proffer as to the anticipated
9 testimony of an anticipated witness, I didn't admit it
10 following Mr. Alessi's testimony. It's true that there was
11 voir dire on it, but I don't know what new argument will be
12 asserted, and it strikes me that the fact that it -- whatever
13 argument is being made in the absence of the witness could be
14 an issue.
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: Right. That's what I understand. That
16 was my understanding. I get it.
17 THE COURT: I'm open to arguments. Obviously, both
18 sides have reargued many issues and I keep an open mind.
19 Anything else?
20 MS. COMEY: Not from the government, your Honor.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: Nothing from the defense, your Honor.
22 (Recess)
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018991
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document