HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023316.jpg

3.2 MB

Extraction Summary

13
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
6
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email printout
File Size: 3.2 MB
Summary

This document is a printout of an email from April 28, 2016, sent to Melanie Spinella (likely an intermediary for a high-net-worth individual, possibly Leslie Wexner given the context of 'Karp', 'Wechsler', and 'Ralph Lerner'). The sender (tone suggests Jeffrey Epstein) aggressively criticizes the recipient's hiring decisions, specifically regarding 'Brad,' 'Joslin,' and 'Castrucci,' and complains about being ignored despite providing financial management advice. The email highlights a strained relationship caused by financial arrangements, inaccurate accounting numbers, and the recipient's refusal to follow the sender's personnel recommendations.

People (13)

Name Role Context
Melanie Spinella Recipient
Addressed in the 'To' field; appears to be an intermediary or the direct recipient of the advice/criticism.
Alan Lawyer/Advisor
Mentioned regarding trust and estate docs; allegedly claimed Paul Weiss drew up docs; accused of suggesting an end-of...
Brad Employee/Associate
Subject of criticism; sender questions his talk of 'flow'; described as 'slipping failing cracking fragile'; sender c...
Karp Legal/Associate
Mentioned in list of people the recipient is angry at ('me, karp wechsler'). Likely Brad Karp.
Wechsler Legal/Associate
Mentioned in list of people the recipient is angry at. Likely Jerry Wechsler.
Debra Unknown context
Mentioned in parenthesis: '(though you ,calling me ,Debra , did take away some of the sting )'. Could be a nickname, ...
Castrucci Job Candidate
Person considered for hiring; sender voted 'no' emphatically.
Tom Senior Partner
Described by sender as 'remarkably careless'; recipient defended him as a 'senior partner'.
Eileen Associate/Employee
Described as 'goofy'; headed the trading desk; involved in hiring decisions.
Ralph Lerner Art Lawyer
Described as 'not well informed'; recipient defended him saying he 'wrote the book'.
Joslin Former Employee
Sender denies hiring him directly; sender confronted him about inaccurate numbers leading to his resignation.
Ada Associate/Employee
Mentioned alongside Eileen regarding management professionals.
John Associate/Employee
Mentioned alongside Brad regarding management.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Paul Weiss
Law firm mentioned regarding drafting documents.
Akin
Law firm (Akin Gump) asked to draft documents during a 'fire drill'.
Phaidon
Publisher; mentioned regarding 'Phaidon documents' that were not received.
House Oversight
Bates stamp indicates this document is part of a House Oversight Committee investigation.

Timeline (2 events)

Monday night (future relative to email)
Sender is leaving.
Unknown
Sender
Unknown past
Confrontation with Joslin regarding inaccurate numbers leading to resignation.
Unknown
Sender Joslin

Relationships (3)

Sender Professional/Personal Melanie Spinella (Recipient)
Sender manages finances/personnel for recipient; mentions 'friendship' complicated by 'financial arrangement'.
Sender Adversarial Professional Brad
Sender calls Brad incompetent, fragile, and criticizes his work ('slipping failing cracking').
Recipient Professional Tom
Recipient defended Tom as a 'senior partner'.

Key Quotes (6)

"I dont think either one of us will figure out what we want to do long term so my thinking is that we should try to have fun everyday, and welcome serendipity."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023316.jpg
Quote #1
"I think another trust and estate lawyer should be brought in to deal with the issues of how not to allow your family to get screwed by your partners on death ."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023316.jpg
Quote #2
"I told him ,in no uncertain terms it is a no , I categorically vote no."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023316.jpg
Quote #3
"against my repeated advice you and eileen decided the pay range at under 300k . I told you at that time that I would personally pay the difference for a higher quality person"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023316.jpg
Quote #4
"you told him, to tell me, that he works for you and NOT for me."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023316.jpg
Quote #5
"having a financial arrangement is fraught with danger and could complitcate our friendship (as you will be unhappy paying what you will view as a large sum. while choosing to ignore"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023316.jpg
Quote #6

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,616 characters)

he do the same thing that he had planned for the day- he wanted to check that he was doing things that he
really wanted to. after three days of getting back an answer of no, he would change what he was going to do. .
he also did not believe in LONG term plans. I dont think either one of us will figure out what we want to do
long term so my thinking is that we should try to have fun everyday, and welcome serendipity.
I think another trust and estate lawyer should be brought in to deal with the issues of how not to allow your
family to get screwed by your partners on death . Alan, for years told me that paul weiss had drawn the
docs so no issue but when recently pushed by my new fire drill he asked akin to draft .?! PLease ask brad
about why he keeps talking about flow . I dont know what he means, its so silly . . this is only about money
control and protection .
I am leaving monday night now. free to speak in the afternoon
Date: Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 1:55 PM
Subject:
To: Melanie Spinella [REDACTED]
Lets start. I am aware that you are currently angry at the world. .. me, karp wechsler. even
yourself, all willing absorbers of the current high heat. (though you ,calling me ,Debra , did take away some
of the sting ) I am sorry to see you this way.
emblematic ; I was asked to opine on whether to hire castrucci. an hour after I gave a preliminary yes. . I
called you then texted you that i had thought more about it and changed my mind. The next day brad called
and asked for my vote. I told him ,in no uncertain terms it is a no , I categorically vote no. I called
you . you came to see me . I said it was a bad idea. you said you were going to do it anyway , I said and
followed up in writing IT IS A MISTAKE . and added Please don't come back to me with anything suggesting
otherwise , you and I should be clear I think it is wrong . A very strong NO . you of course can hire whomever
you like.
early on I told you I thought Tom remarkably careless . Eilleen goofy and your art lawyer not well informed to
say the least. you told me Tom was a senior partner. Eileen had headed the trading desk , and Ralph Lerner had
to know what he was doing as he wrote the book. . I said I thought you deserved better ,should get better
people and no , I am not an HR person. yesterday you told me that the reason you have hired whomver you
could find was to avoid being dependent on me. a decision by far , not the best place to try to save money )
Joslin- who you say I hired . I neither found nor hired. With a two person given choice I approved joslin over
some woman that eileen preferred. against my repeated advice you and eileen decided the pay range at under
300k . I told you at that time that I would personally pay the difference for a higher quality person, that was
years ago . I have sent over a hundred emails to you clearly saying he needs to be closely managed by
better professionals. initially , that referred to Eillen and Ada.and after, brad. john etc. THere are
many emails each and every month from me, telling you , he is slipping failing cracking fragile. . crazy, nuts,
heading towards incompetence. Unless YOU- TAKE ACTION! when I pressured him for accurate numbers ,
you told him, to tell me, that he works for you and NOT for me. . When I continued to press for accuracy from
your office , you told me that they were now all afraid of me and i should let brad communicate any requests, (
you now tell me " we know what Brad is"?). When I told you you office needs to be reviewed and changed you
told me i was being destructive rather than constructive. when i ultimately confronted joslin, in an attempt to
protect you, told him that his numbers were wildly inaccurate , you told me that i had caused his ultimate
resignation and now have an affirmative obligation to fill in the resultant gap.
I did give you a bad number , and apologized as soon as i realized it. an error that was an embarrassment for me
, the fact that that the accurate number is still way below what you agreed to pay , has fallen by the
wayside.( the preposterous argument that the end of year transaction was Alans idea , which you now know
was not true and that me not receiving Phaidon documents was unexplainable. was your justification
though, for non - full payment )
Hopefully You will recall that when you initially asked for my help. I declined repeatedly with the
admonition that that having a financial arrangement is fraught with danger and could complitcate our
friendship (as you will be unhappy paying what you will view as a large sum. while choosing to ignore
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023316

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document