HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010513.jpg
1.89 MB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Deposition transcript
File Size:
1.89 MB
Summary
This document is a partial transcript from the videotaped deposition of Michael Reiter on November 23, 2009, related to a civil lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein. Reiter discusses sending a letter to State Attorney Barry Krischer in May 2006, following prior conversations, because he felt the handling of the case by the state attorney's office was unusual and that there was a lack of objectivity.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Reiter | Deponent |
Videotaped Deposition in B.B. vs. Epstein
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant |
Party in the civil lawsuit
|
| Barry Krischer | State Attorney |
Received a letter from Michael Reiter and had conversations with him
|
| M | Unspecified |
Michael Reiter knew 'M' about the case. Likely a redacted name.
|
| B.B. | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the civil lawsuit against Epstein
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| State Attorney's Office |
Handled the case, detective attempted to contact them
|
Timeline (2 events)
May 2006
Michael Reiter felt the handling of the case by the state attorney's office was unusual and prompted him to write a letter.
November 23, 2009
Videotaped Deposition of Michael Reiter in the civil lawsuit B.B. vs. Epstein.
Relationships (3)
Videotaped Deposition of Michael Reiter in B.B. vs. Epstein, a civil lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein
Sent a letter to Krischer and had conversations with him
I knew that M about this case.
Key Quotes (4)
"Q: At some point you sent a letter to state attorney Barry Krischer. Let me show you what we'll mark as exhibit 3. Let me give you a chance to read through this letter again to help refresh your recollection."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010513.jpg
Quote #1
"A: Well, I felt the handling- way the state attorney's off unusual. I knew that M about this case. I felt tha felt that the appropriate governed the assignment that his action met the st from the statute in here. A wouldn't return my phone"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010513.jpg
Quote #2
"Q: Could you tell us, explain tivity may be lacking in r other words, what evidenc you felt made it potentially"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010513.jpg
Quote #3
"A: Well...when I first told h that it was a serious case, | [and] that the suspect was it. And we were-it was i meeting that he and I we known him to be a victim. of children. Well, I know tl statute that addresses tho"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010513.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,544 characters)
CHAPTER 45
Videotaped Deposition of Michael Reiter in B.B. vs.
Epstein, a civil lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein:
November 23, 2009
Q: At some point you sent a letter to state attorney Barry
Krischer. Let me show you what we'll mark as exhibit 3. Let
me give you a chance to read through this letter again to help
refresh your recollection.
A: I've read it.
Q: At this point, in May of 2006, I'm assuming based on what
you told us before that you had had some conversations with
Barry Krischer directly... by phone-correct? - prior to this
letter.
A: I had conversations in person and by phone.
Q: Okay. But nonetheless in May - May 1, 2006-you felt the
need to write this letter; is that correct?
A: Yes.
FIL
Q: Can you tell us why?
A: Well, I felt the handling-
way the state attorney's off
unusual. I knew that M
about this case. I felt tha
felt that the appropriate
governed the assignment
that his action met the st
from the statute in here. A
wouldn't return my phone
The detective attempt
state attorney's office, Laı
nounce that...and she wo
the letter in hope that he w
realize that his objectivity
case and ask the governor
like that was necessary for
had been submitted to hin
Q: Could you tell us, explain
tivity may be lacking in r
other words, what evidenc
you felt made it potentially
A: Well...when I first told h
that it was a serious case, |
[and] that the suspect was
it. And we were-it was i
meeting that he and I we
known him to be a victim.
of children. Well, I know tl
statute that addresses tho
172
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010513
Videotaped Deposition of Michael Reiter in B.B. vs.
Epstein, a civil lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein:
November 23, 2009
Q: At some point you sent a letter to state attorney Barry
Krischer. Let me show you what we'll mark as exhibit 3. Let
me give you a chance to read through this letter again to help
refresh your recollection.
A: I've read it.
Q: At this point, in May of 2006, I'm assuming based on what
you told us before that you had had some conversations with
Barry Krischer directly... by phone-correct? - prior to this
letter.
A: I had conversations in person and by phone.
Q: Okay. But nonetheless in May - May 1, 2006-you felt the
need to write this letter; is that correct?
A: Yes.
FIL
Q: Can you tell us why?
A: Well, I felt the handling-
way the state attorney's off
unusual. I knew that M
about this case. I felt tha
felt that the appropriate
governed the assignment
that his action met the st
from the statute in here. A
wouldn't return my phone
The detective attempt
state attorney's office, Laı
nounce that...and she wo
the letter in hope that he w
realize that his objectivity
case and ask the governor
like that was necessary for
had been submitted to hin
Q: Could you tell us, explain
tivity may be lacking in r
other words, what evidenc
you felt made it potentially
A: Well...when I first told h
that it was a serious case, |
[and] that the suspect was
it. And we were-it was i
meeting that he and I we
known him to be a victim.
of children. Well, I know tl
statute that addresses tho
172
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010513
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document