This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the beginning of the government's rebuttal argument in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The prosecutor, Ms. Comey, argues that the case is about Maxwell's crimes against children she targeted for abuse, specifically naming victims Jane, Carolyn, and Annie. She dismisses the defense's arguments as attempts to distract the jury and asserts the government's right to respond to them.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Comey | Government Attorney/Prosecutor |
Speaker presenting the rebuttal argument for the government.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker who directs the proceedings, likely the presiding judge.
|
| Jane | Victim |
Mentioned as a victim whose breasts were touched by the defendant.
|
| Carolyn | Victim |
Mentioned as a victim whose breasts were touched by the defendant.
|
| Annie | Victim |
Mentioned as a victim whose breasts were touched by the defendant.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Identified as the defendant in the case, referred to as "that woman" and explicitly named.
|
| Ms. Moe |
Mentioned as someone who presented evidence to the jury, likely a witness or another attorney.
|
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Referenced by Ms. Comey as the judge who instructed the jury on the burden of proof.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
"Everyone may be seated. Thank you, members of the jury. We'll now hear a short rebuttal argument by the government."Source
"I want to start off by making one thing very clear, this case is about that woman, it's about the children that she targeted, the steps that she took to serve those children up to be abused."Source
"This case is about Ghislaine Maxwell, the crimes she committed."Source
"As Judge Nathan has instructed you, the government bears the burden of proof and we embrace that burden, but when the defense makes arguments like they just did, it is perfectly appropriate for you to think about whether those arguments make any sense at all and it is perfectly appropriate for the government to respond to those arguments."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,536 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document