This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument over evidence. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, seeks to admit photographs given to him by Ms. Espinosa, which were sent to her by a soap opera star named Jane. The government's attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, objects to the admission of these photographs, questioning their relevance to the case.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, asking questions and acknowledging counsel.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaking on behalf of a client, seeking to admit photographs into evidence.
|
| MS. POMERANTZ | Attorney |
Representing the government, stating that the government does not understand the relevance of the proffered exhibits.
|
| Ms. Espinosa |
Provided photographs to Mr. Everdell. Described as a fan of a soap opera star named Jane, who sent her the photographs.
|
|
| Jane | soap opera star |
A soap opera star who was on a show that Ms. Espinosa was a fan of. She sent photographs of herself and other cast me...
|
| Ms. Galindo |
Mentioned by Mr. Everdell as a mistake when he meant to say Ms. Espinosa.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
| the government | government agency |
A party in the legal case, represented by Ms. Pomerantz, which objects to the relevance of the photographs.
|
"It's a series of photographs from the soap opera of Jane's -- that Jane was on, because Ms. Galindo -- sorry, Ms. Espinosa was a fan of the soap opera. And after Jane went and became a soap opera star, Jane sent her these photographs."Source
"Your Honor, the government remains of the view it doesn't understand the relevance of these particular proffered exhibits;"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,578 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document