This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. Mr. Pagliuca attempts to direct Carolyn to specific passages in a prior deposition, leading to procedural clarifications from the judge and an objection from another attorney, Ms. Comey. The transcript captures the formal and often disjointed process of presenting evidence in a legal setting.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
The witness being cross-examined. She is addressed directly by the court and is under oath.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
The attorney conducting the cross-examination of Carolyn.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge in the proceeding, addressed as 'your Honor'.
|
| THE WITNESS | Witness |
A label for Carolyn's testimony in the transcript.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney |
An attorney who objects to Mr. Pagliuca's line of questioning.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
"Mr. Pagliuca, you may continue with your cross-examination."Source
"I'd like to direct the witness to 3505-43, page 10, deposition page 31, lines 21 through 25."Source
"Your Honor, I would object to this."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,218 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document