EFTA00009977.pdf

93.7 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 93.7 KB
Summary

A chain of emails between the FBI New York Field Office and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) from late 2018. The officials discuss recent reporting by the Miami Herald and CNN regarding Jeffrey Epstein's previous non-prosecution deal and sealed indictment. They coordinate a conference call to discuss gathered information on the 'Jeff Epstein matter' and plan a subsequent meeting with case agents to determine next steps.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Redacted Assistant Special Agent in Charge
New York Field Office (FBI); discusses CNN article and sealed indictment.
Redacted Assistant United States Attorney
Human Trafficking Co-Coordinator, Violent & Organized Crime, Southern District of New York; initiates thread regardin...
Jeffrey Epstein Subject
Subject of the news articles and the 'matter' being discussed by federal agents.

Timeline (2 events)

2018-11-30
Conference call to determine the way forward on the Jeff Epstein matter.
Phone/Conference Room
FBI Agents US Attorneys
2018-12-06
Planned meeting with case agents to discuss next steps (mentioned in Dec 5 email as 'Thursday').
Unspecified
Case agents Redacted officials

Locations (2)

Relationships (1)

Assistant Special Agent in Charge (FBI) Professional Collaboration Assistant United States Attorney (SDNY)
Coordinating calls and meetings regarding the Epstein case across agencies.

Key Quotes (3)

"Notable was reference to the sealed Federal indictment. I hadn't realized that he had already been indicted when he got the deal."
Source
EFTA00009977.pdf
Quote #1
"We've been able to gather some information on the Jeff Epstein matter and I'd suggest we have a call to determine the way forward."
Source
EFTA00009977.pdf
Quote #2
"From the article is sounds like he cooperated in a financial fraud case and was non-prosd."
Source
EFTA00009977.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,405 characters)

From: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: Re: FW: RE:
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 01:37:07 +0000
Importance: Normal
Thanks. We are meeting with the case agents on Thursday to discuss next steps and will report back to discuss the plan.
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 4, 2018, at 8:27 PM, [Redacted] wrote:
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Tuesday, December 4, 2018 8:27 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: Re: RE:
In case you hadn't seen it yet. Notable was reference to the sealed Federal indictment. I hadn't realized that he had already been indicted when he got the deal.
https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/12/04/politics/jeffrey-epstein-lawsuit-settled/index.html?r=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2F
[Redacted]
Assistant Special Agent in Charge
New York Field Office
[Redacted]
-------- Original message --------
From: [Redacted]
Date: 11/30/18 2:38 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: RE:
Yes, we can do that
EFTA00009977
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 2:33 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: RE:
Can you all can call my desk ([Redacted]) from one conference room? If that won't work, I'll get a call in number and put that out to everyone.
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 2:10 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: RE:
330 is good.
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 1:39 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: Re: RE:
Either of those times work for me. [Redacted] and I have a meeting at 2 so 3:30 would be better if possible.
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 30, 2018, at 1:35 PM, [Redacted] wrote:
All,
We've been able to gather some information on the Jeff Epstein matter and I'd suggest we have a call to determine the way forward. Does 3:00 or 3:30 today work?
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 4:40 PM
To: [Redacted]
Subject: FW:
From: [Redacted] [mailto:[Redacted]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2018 1:36 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject:
[Redacted]
EFTA00009978
Have you seen this article?
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article220097825.html
Have any insight? From the article is sounds like he cooperated in a financial fraud case and was non-prosd.
[Redacted] and I can chat whenever.
Thanks,
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
Human Trafficking Co-Coordinator
Violent & Organized Crime
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
EFTA00009979

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document