DOJ-OGR-00017316.jpg
633 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
633 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument about the purpose of travel undertaken by a person named Jane. An unnamed speaker argues that Jane's return trip from New Mexico was not for illicit sexual activity because Mr. Epstein was not present, while another speaker, Ms. Moe, counters that the evidence is ambiguous as to which flight is being discussed. The conversation centers on interpreting Jane's intent and whether her travel meets the elements of a crime.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Subject of testimony |
Mentioned as the person who traveled across state lines, specifically to and from New Mexico. Her testimony and the p...
|
| Mr. Epstein |
Mentioned in the context of a return trip Jane took. The speaker notes that Mr. Epstein wasn't present on this return...
|
|
| MS. MOE | Speaker (likely an attorney) |
A speaker in the transcript who addresses the judge ('Your Honor') to argue about the clarity of a note concerning fl...
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Addressed by MS. MOE, indicating the presence of a judge in the proceedings.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-08-10
A court hearing where the purpose and motivation behind Jane's travel were debated.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the destination of a flight and the origin of a return flight taken by Jane.
|
Relationships (2)
The document discusses Jane's travel in relation to Mr. Epstein's presence. It mentions Jane's testimony that she went to New Mexico to engage in sexual activity, and that Mr. Epstein was presumably in New Mexico when she left, but was not present on her return trip.
MS. MOE directly addresses 'Your Honor' in a formal court setting.
Key Quotes (3)
"There is no significant or motivating purpose of a return trip where Mr. Epstein wasn't present; it's just a return trip from New Mexico."Source
— Unnamed Speaker
(Arguing that Jane's return travel lacked the illicit purpose required for the crime being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00017316.jpg
Quote #1
"The testimony, if we are to believe it, is that she went to New Mexico for some purpose to engage in sexual activity, that's if you believe Jane's testimony."Source
— Unnamed Speaker
(Referencing Jane's own testimony about the purpose of her initial trip to New Mexico.)
DOJ-OGR-00017316.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, I don't believe this note is that clear about what flight we're talking about."Source
— MS. MOE
(Objecting to the previous speaker's argument by pointing out ambiguity in the evidence (a note) regarding which of Jane's flights is being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00017316.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,657 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 12 of 29 3129
LCRVMAXT
LCRVMAXT
1 across state lines has to be that Jane engaged in illicit
2 sexual activity. There is no significant or motivating purpose
3 of a return trip where Mr. Epstein wasn't present; it's just a
4 return trip from New Mexico. That would not be a significant
5 or motivating purpose. She is just presumably going home, but
6 is not for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual activity.
7 The testimony, if we are to believe it, is that she
8 went to New Mexico for some purpose to engage in sexual
9 activity, that's if you believe Jane's testimony. But
10 returning from there is not that purpose. Returning is
11 returning, or it's going somewhere else; it's going somewhere
12 away from where -- at least in the record, the evidence in the
13 record, if there is any -- Epstein was presumably in New
14 Mexico. This is her leaving New Mexico. So I don't think that
15 qualifies as a significant or motivating purpose. That travel
16 across state lines is for some other purpose.
17 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I don't believe this note is
18 that clear about what flight we're talking about. The note
19 begins by talking about an unspecified return flight, and then
20 it turns to talking about a flight to New Mexico. Then there's
21 a modifying clause about intent. It is unclear which of the
22 two flights we are now modifying.
23 I think the safest course here is to refer the jury to
24 the elements of the crime. I think guessing at what flight
25 they may be talking about is sort of beyond the reach of this
2 sexual activity. There is no significant or motivating purpose
3 of a return trip where Mr. Epstein wasn't present; it's just a
4 return trip from New Mexico. That would not be a significant
5 or motivating purpose. She is just presumably going home, but
6 is not for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual activity.
7 The testimony, if we are to believe it, is that she
8 went to New Mexico for some purpose to engage in sexual
9 activity, that's if you believe Jane's testimony. But
10 returning from there is not that purpose. Returning is
11 returning, or it's going somewhere else; it's going somewhere
12 away from where -- at least in the record, the evidence in the
13 record, if there is any -- Epstein was presumably in New
14 Mexico. This is her leaving New Mexico. So I don't think that
15 qualifies as a significant or motivating purpose. That travel
16 across state lines is for some other purpose.
17 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I don't believe this note is
18 that clear about what flight we're talking about. The note
19 begins by talking about an unspecified return flight, and then
20 it turns to talking about a flight to New Mexico. Then there's
21 a modifying clause about intent. It is unclear which of the
22 two flights we are now modifying.
23 I think the safest course here is to refer the jury to
24 the elements of the crime. I think guessing at what flight
25 they may be talking about is sort of beyond the reach of this
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017316
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document