DOJ-OGR-00018814.jpg
576 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
576 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca, Ms. Comey, and the judge. They are debating inconsistencies in the testimony of a witness named Carolyn, specifically regarding the timeframe of payments she allegedly received from Mr. Epstein and whether her testimony described sexual contact or merely being seen naked in a massage room. The judge ultimately suggests checking the official transcript to resolve the dispute.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined.
|
| Mr. Epstein |
Mentioned as a person who may have paid the witness, Carolyn.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, presiding over the proceedings.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, questioning the witness's testimony.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, responding to Mr. Pagliuca's points.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
A title used by Ms. Comey and Ms. Comey to address the judge (THE COURT).
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn, focusing on inconsistencies in her testimony.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where the witness was allegedly seen naked.
|
Relationships (4)
The document discusses a claim that Carolyn was "given or paid" by Mr. Epstein between 2002 and 2003.
Mr. Pagliuca is an attorney presenting arguments to the judge in a formal court setting.
Ms. Comey is an attorney addressing the judge as 'Your Honor' and presenting her recollection of testimony.
The two attorneys are presenting opposing interpretations of a witness's testimony during a court proceeding, suggesting they are opposing counsel.
Key Quotes (3)
"19 is all males who had any sexual contact with her. It says sexual assault or battery since age 10. And the answer is none. And she's testified that there were two males, I believe, that had sexual contact with her."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Arguing that the witness's answer of 'none' to a question about sexual assault contradicts her previous testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00018814.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, I believe the testimony was that they saw her naked in the massage room. I don't believe there was testimony about sexual contact."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Countering Mr. Pagliuca's point by clarifying her recollection of the witness's testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00018814.jpg
Quote #2
"It's mine as well, but you'll check the transcript. In the absence of that, I don't see any inconsistency."Source
— THE COURT
(Agreeing with Ms. Comey's recollection but instructing the attorneys to verify with the official transcript.)
DOJ-OGR-00018814.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,460 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 216 of 264 1657
LC7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross
LC7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross
1 claim you were given or paid to you by Mr. Epstein or someone,
2 yaddah, yaddah. And we have an expansive time frame here. And
3 the question, 2000 to 2006. And then the answer again is she's
4 only paid for May or June of 2002 to August of 2003. So we've
5 excluded two whole years by this answer in terms of the time
6 frame the witness testified to.
7 THE COURT: Okay. On the time frame inconsistency,
8 I'll allow 17, question and answer.
9 What's next?
10 MR. PAGLIUCA: 19 is all males who had any sexual
11 contact with her. It says sexual assault or battery since age
12 10. And the answer is none. And she's testified that there
13 were two males, I believe, that had sexual contact with her.
14 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe the testimony was
15 that they saw her naked in the massage room. I don't believe
16 there was testimony about sexual contact. I would want to
17 check the transcript, your Honor, but that is my recollection
18 of the testimony.
19 THE COURT: It's mine as well, but you'll check the
20 transcript. In the absence of that, I don't see any
21 inconsistency.
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, then 20 covers lewd or lascivious
23 conduct, which would be naked people in a massage looking at a
24 naked underage --
25 MS. COMEY: Again, your Honor, the testimony was just
2 yaddah, yaddah. And we have an expansive time frame here. And
3 the question, 2000 to 2006. And then the answer again is she's
4 only paid for May or June of 2002 to August of 2003. So we've
5 excluded two whole years by this answer in terms of the time
6 frame the witness testified to.
7 THE COURT: Okay. On the time frame inconsistency,
8 I'll allow 17, question and answer.
9 What's next?
10 MR. PAGLIUCA: 19 is all males who had any sexual
11 contact with her. It says sexual assault or battery since age
12 10. And the answer is none. And she's testified that there
13 were two males, I believe, that had sexual contact with her.
14 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, I believe the testimony was
15 that they saw her naked in the massage room. I don't believe
16 there was testimony about sexual contact. I would want to
17 check the transcript, your Honor, but that is my recollection
18 of the testimony.
19 THE COURT: It's mine as well, but you'll check the
20 transcript. In the absence of that, I don't see any
21 inconsistency.
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, then 20 covers lewd or lascivious
23 conduct, which would be naked people in a massage looking at a
24 naked underage --
25 MS. COMEY: Again, your Honor, the testimony was just
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018814
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document