DOJ-OGR-00010363.jpg
530 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order / legal filing
File Size:
530 KB
Summary
In this court order dated April 1, 2022, Judge Alison J. Nathan denies the Defendant's (Ghislaine Maxwell) motion for a new trial, concluding that Juror 50 harbored no bias and the selection process was not deliberately flawed. The Court orders a presentence investigation report and confirms that sentencing remains scheduled for June 28, 2022. Additionally, time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act regarding specific counts through April 22, 2022.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | United States Circuit Judge |
Judge signing the order denying the motion for a new trial.
|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Subject of a bias inquiry; the court concluded they harbored no bias.
|
| Defendant | Defendant |
Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by Case 1:20-cr-00330); subject of the denied motion for a new trial.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court |
United States District Court (Southern District of New York implied by location/Judge).
|
|
| Government |
Prosecution; mentioned regarding a letter dated January 10, 2022.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the order was signed.
|
Relationships (2)
Judge Nathan ruled that Juror 50 harbored no bias.
Judge Nathan denied the Defendant's motion for a new trial.
Key Quotes (3)
"The Court further concludes that Juror 50 harbored no bias toward the Defendant and could serve as a fair and impartial juror."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010363.jpg
Quote #1
"The Defendant’s motion for a new trial pursuant to Rule 33 is therefore DENIED."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010363.jpg
Quote #2
"Sentencing remains scheduled for June 28, 2022."Source
DOJ-OGR-00010363.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,391 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 653 Filed 04/01/22 Page 40 of 40
selection process was highly unfortunate, but not deliberate. The Court further concludes that
Juror 50 harbored no bias toward the Defendant and could serve as a fair and impartial juror.
The requirements for a new trial under McDonough are not satisfied. The Defendant’s motion
for a new trial pursuant to Rule 33 is therefore DENIED.
Juror 50 harbored no bias toward the Defendant and could serve as a fair and impartial juror.
The requirements for a new trial under McDonough are not satisfied. The Defendant’s motion
for a new trial pursuant to Rule 33 is therefore DENIED.
The Court orders the preparation of the presentence investigation report.
With respect to Counts 7 and 8, the Court hereby excludes time under the Speedy Trial
Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), from today’s date through April 22, 2022. The Court finds that
the ends of justice served by granting this exclusion from speedy trial computations outweigh the
interests of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial on these counts because the pending
post-trial motions affect the scheduling considerations set forth in the Government’s January 10,
2022 letter. See Dkt. No. 574. The Defendant consents to this exclusion. Dkt. No. 650.
Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), from today’s date through April 22, 2022. The Court finds that
the ends of justice served by granting this exclusion from speedy trial computations outweigh the
interests of the public and the Defendant in a speedy trial on these counts because the pending
post-trial motions affect the scheduling considerations set forth in the Government’s January 10,
2022 letter. See Dkt. No. 574. The Defendant consents to this exclusion. Dkt. No. 650.
The Court will rule on the Defendant’s remaining post-verdict motions in due course.
Sentencing remains scheduled for June 28, 2022. This resolves docket numbers 613, 614, 642,
650, and 651.
Sentencing remains scheduled for June 28, 2022. This resolves docket numbers 613, 614, 642,
650, and 651.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 1, 2022
New York, New York
New York, New York
Alison J. Nathan
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States Circuit Judge
Sitting by Designation
ALISON J. NATHAN
United States Circuit Judge
Sitting by Designation
40
DOJ-OGR-00010363
DOJ-OGR-00010363
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document