This court transcript captures an argument from a defense attorney, Mr. Everdell, objecting to a 'conscious avoidance' jury instruction for his client, Ms. Maxwell. He argues that the instruction is inappropriate because testimony from witnesses Jane, Annie, and Carolyn establishes Ms. Maxwell as an active participant in the alleged sexual crimes, not someone who deliberately ignored them. The attorney cites specific acts like participating in massages and groping to prove direct involvement, thereby negating the basis for a conscious avoidance theory.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney |
Speaker arguing against a jury instruction on behalf of the defense.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, addressed as 'your Honor' by Mr. Everdell.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the legal argument, alleged by witnesses to be an active participant in sexual acts.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Provided testimony that Ms. Maxwell was involved in group sexualized massages.
|
| Annie | Witness |
Provided testimony that Ms. Maxwell performed a topless massage on her.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Provided testimony that Ms. Maxwell groped her breasts and hips.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | government agency |
The judicial body presiding over the case.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting firm that transcribed the proceedings.
|
"the government's theory of the case and the proof that's been elicited through the testimony is that she was an active participant in all aspects of the charges."Source
"These are all active-participant measures. This is someone that's not consciously avoiding."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,639 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document