DOJ-OGR-00018054.jpg
589 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
589 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a procedural discussion between attorneys Ms. Comey, Mr. Pagliuca, and the presiding judge. The parties agree on a method for admitting exhibit 52 into evidence, deciding to use a redacted version consisting of specific pages (52A, D, E, F, G, H) for the jury. The agreement clarifies that the exhibit will be authenticated and admitted in this limited form.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Speaking on behalf of a party, proposing to admit a narrowed, five-page version of exhibit 52 into evidence.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, questioning the attorneys and ruling on the admission of evidence.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Mentioned by Ms. Comey and speaks to the court, clarifying the procedure for admitting a redacted version of exhibit 52.
|
| Alessi | Unknown |
Mentioned in the header of the transcript, possibly a witness under direct examination ("Alessi - Direct").
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
| DOJ | Government agency |
Appears as a prefix in the document control number (DOJ-OGR-00018054), suggesting Department of Justice involvement.
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Comey addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and presents legal arguments and proposals regarding evidence.
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and collaborates on establishing a clear record for an evidentiary ruling.
They are both attorneys in the same legal proceeding, discussing and agreeing upon the handling of evidence proposed by one of their parties.
Key Quotes (4)
"Your Honor, we're not offering the entirety of 52. As I believe we mentioned to your Honor in briefing, we're trying to narrow what we're offering from this exhibit, and so we picked five pages that are particularly relevant to the facts that are at issue in this case..."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Explaining the proposal to admit only a portion of exhibit 52.)
DOJ-OGR-00018054.jpg
Quote #1
"So the record will be clear that 52, if the Court is going to allow it, is authenticated and admitted, and that it's a redacted version of 52 is what's going to the jury."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Summarizing the agreement for the official court record.)
DOJ-OGR-00018054.jpg
Quote #2
"That sounds exactly right."Source
— THE COURT
(Confirming and agreeing with Mr. Pagliuca's summary of the procedure.)
DOJ-OGR-00018054.jpg
Quote #3
"It's 52A, D, E, F, G and H."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Specifying which subpages of exhibit 52 will be admitted into evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00018054.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,515 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 181 of 228 857
LC2Qmax5 - corrected Alessi - Direct
LC2Qmax5 - corrected Alessi - Direct
1 MS. COMEY: I'm sorry, your Honor, I didn't hear the
2 proposal.
3 THE COURT: Why not do it that way?
4 MS. COMEY: I didn't hear Mr. Pagliuca's proposal.
5 THE COURT: Why not deal with the admission, the offer
6 of 52 -- I mean, we don't need testimony on the subpages --
7 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, we're not offering the
8 entirety of 52. As I believe we mentioned to your Honor in
9 briefing, we're trying to narrow what we're offering from this
10 exhibit, and so we picked five pages that are particularly
11 relevant to the facts that are at issue in this case, and we
12 would only propose to show the jury those five pages, which is
13 why we're going through this process.
14 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't have a problem with that, your
15 Honor, but I think what I would say is they would offer 52 and,
16 in essence, it's a redacted version of 52 that's going to the
17 jury. So the record will be clear that 52, if the Court is
18 going to allow it, is authenticated and admitted, and that it's
19 a redacted version of 52 is what's going to the jury.
20 THE COURT: That sounds exactly right.
21 MS. COMEY: That's fine, your Honor.
22 THE COURT: So it's 52A through what?
23 MS. COMEY: It's 52A, D, E, F, G and H.
24 THE COURT: So you will -- to the extent you have more
25 testimony to elicit for authentication, you're done, I presume
2 proposal.
3 THE COURT: Why not do it that way?
4 MS. COMEY: I didn't hear Mr. Pagliuca's proposal.
5 THE COURT: Why not deal with the admission, the offer
6 of 52 -- I mean, we don't need testimony on the subpages --
7 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, we're not offering the
8 entirety of 52. As I believe we mentioned to your Honor in
9 briefing, we're trying to narrow what we're offering from this
10 exhibit, and so we picked five pages that are particularly
11 relevant to the facts that are at issue in this case, and we
12 would only propose to show the jury those five pages, which is
13 why we're going through this process.
14 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't have a problem with that, your
15 Honor, but I think what I would say is they would offer 52 and,
16 in essence, it's a redacted version of 52 that's going to the
17 jury. So the record will be clear that 52, if the Court is
18 going to allow it, is authenticated and admitted, and that it's
19 a redacted version of 52 is what's going to the jury.
20 THE COURT: That sounds exactly right.
21 MS. COMEY: That's fine, your Honor.
22 THE COURT: So it's 52A through what?
23 MS. COMEY: It's 52A, D, E, F, G and H.
24 THE COURT: So you will -- to the extent you have more
25 testimony to elicit for authentication, you're done, I presume
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018054
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document