DOJ-OGR-00021595.jpg
481 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
481 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from June 29, 2023, for Case 22-1426. The transcript captures a discussion between the judge, Mr. Everdell, and Ms. Moe regarding sentencing guidelines, where the court confirms an offense level increase to 36 and a guideline range of 188 to 235. Mr. Everdell formally preserves an objection to the government's request to treat two individuals, Virginia and Melissa, as separate offense groups for sentencing purposes.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney (implied) |
Speaking to the court, agreeing with a point and then preserving an objection regarding the grouping of individuals f...
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (implied) |
Speaking to the court, agreeing with the guideline calculation and responding to the judge's questions.
|
| The Judge | Judge |
Referred to as 'THE COURT' and 'your Honor'. The judge is presiding over the hearing, stating sentencing guideline ca...
|
| Virginia |
Mentioned as an individual the government requested to be added as a separate group for sentencing purposes.
|
|
| Melissa |
Mentioned as an individual the government requested to be added as a separate group for sentencing purposes.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | government agency |
The entity presiding over the legal proceedings, represented by the judge.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2023-06-29
A discussion took place regarding sentencing guidelines in Case 22-1426. The court confirmed an increase in the offense level from 32 to 36, resulting in a guideline range of 188 to 235. Mr. Everdell preserved an objection to the government's request to treat Virginia and Melissa as separate offense groups.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (3)
Mr. Everdell addresses the judge as 'your Honor' and presents legal arguments and objections in a formal court setting.
Ms. Moe addresses the judge as 'your Honor' and responds to the judge's questions during the proceeding.
Both are attorneys participating in the same court hearing, addressing the judge on related matters, implying they are opposing counsel or otherwise involved in the same case.
Key Quotes (4)
"Under the 2003 manual -- I see. The highest total offense level, increase by 4 from 32 to 36."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge is stating the calculation for the sentencing offense level.)
DOJ-OGR-00021595.jpg
Quote #1
"And that produces a guideline range 188 to 235."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge is stating the resulting sentencing guideline range based on the new offense level.)
DOJ-OGR-00021595.jpg
Quote #2
"I don't think because the government's response was the one added their request to add Virginia and Melissa as separate groups, so we do object to that."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Mr. Everdell is stating the basis for his objection regarding the sentencing calculation.)
DOJ-OGR-00021595.jpg
Quote #3
"I understand the Court has already ruled on that, but we would like to preserve that objection."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Acknowledging a prior ruling while formally preserving an objection for the record.)
DOJ-OGR-00021595.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,328 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page165 of 217
SA-419
50
M6SQmax1
1 the table is more than 5, as 5 levels. And, thus, the total
2 number would be 36.
3 THE COURT: I presume you agree with that,
4 Mr. Everdell?
5 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Under the 2003 manual -- I see. The
7 highest total offense level, increase by 4 from 32 to 36.
8 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.
9 THE COURT: Thank you, Ms. Moe. And that produces a
10 guideline range 188 to 235.
11 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
12 MR. EVERDELL: We agree with that, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: Thank you. Same question to you,
14 Mr. Everdell. Preserving your objections, of course, but
15 anything new based on what I said?
16 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. I don't think because
17 the government's response was the one added their request to
18 add Virginia and Melissa as separate groups, so we do object to
19 that. I know the Court has already ruled on that. We don't
20 think the record is adequate to make them separate offense
21 groups. I understand the Court has already ruled on that, but
22 we would like to preserve that objection.
23 THE COURT: Understood. Thank you.
24 Do you want to respond, Ms. Moe?
25 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I think the Court's rulings
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•••
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021595
SA-419
50
M6SQmax1
1 the table is more than 5, as 5 levels. And, thus, the total
2 number would be 36.
3 THE COURT: I presume you agree with that,
4 Mr. Everdell?
5 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Under the 2003 manual -- I see. The
7 highest total offense level, increase by 4 from 32 to 36.
8 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.
9 THE COURT: Thank you, Ms. Moe. And that produces a
10 guideline range 188 to 235.
11 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
12 MR. EVERDELL: We agree with that, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: Thank you. Same question to you,
14 Mr. Everdell. Preserving your objections, of course, but
15 anything new based on what I said?
16 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. I don't think because
17 the government's response was the one added their request to
18 add Virginia and Melissa as separate groups, so we do object to
19 that. I know the Court has already ruled on that. We don't
20 think the record is adequate to make them separate offense
21 groups. I understand the Court has already ruled on that, but
22 we would like to preserve that objection.
23 THE COURT: Understood. Thank you.
24 Do you want to respond, Ms. Moe?
25 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I think the Court's rulings
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.•••
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021595
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document