DOJ-OGR-00021562.jpg
524 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
524 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (specifically page 17 of the session, page 132 of the filing) involving a discussion between an attorney, Mr. Everdell, and the Judge regarding sentencing procedures. The Judge confirms the rejection of a redaction request and states that testimony from an individual named 'Kate' is relevant to the sentencing. The parties agree to delay arguments regarding offense level calculations and financial penalties until a later point in the proceeding.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Discussing objections to sentencing calculations and financial penalties with the judge.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, ruling on redactions, and managing the order of objections.
|
| Kate | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned by the Court; her testimony and statement are deemed relevant to sentencing.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer attribution.
|
|
| Probation |
Mentioned as having responded to requests and assertions.
|
|
| The Government |
Mentioned by Mr. Everdell regarding representations made in their response.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the court reporter's name and area code (likely SDNY).
|
Relationships (1)
Standard courtroom dialogue structure.
Key Quotes (4)
"So I did reject the request for redactions for the reasons explained in my order."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021562.jpg
Quote #1
"Kate's testimony and her statement are relevant to sentencing which I've indicated she may give."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021562.jpg
Quote #2
"So we'll delay the offense level calculation objections and the ones related to the financial penalties for now?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021562.jpg
Quote #3
"The government made in their response some representations that we take issue with"Source
DOJ-OGR-00021562.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,504 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page132 of 217
SA-386
SA-386
17
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
1 MR. EVERDELL: That's correct, your Honor.
2 THE COURT: So I did reject the request for redactions
3 for the reasons explained in my order. And as I explained in
4 overruling the objection to paragraphs 39 to 45, Kate's
5 testimony and her statement are relevant to sentencing which
6 I've indicated she may give. And with that, there's objections
7 pertaining to fine and assets and the like. I think we can
8 turn to those when we get to the fine. Mr. Everdell, okay with
9 that?
10 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. So we'll delay the
11 offense level calculation objections and the ones related to
12 the financial penalties for now?
13 THE COURT: Yes, precisely, and we'll pick those up.
14 I think otherwise that's it for what I understand to be
15 continuing objections after probation responded to your
16 requests and assertions. Agree with that, Mr. Everdell?
17 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, the only one that I would
18 highlight is there was an objection, I believe it's framed
19 according to paragraph 173, which deals with the financial
20 penalties. The government made in their response some
21 representations that we take issue with, but if you're planning
22 on covering that later, we can reserve that till later because
23 it does deal with the financial penalties.
24 THE COURT: Yes, I have objections to 172, 178, 192
25 and 193.
2 THE COURT: So I did reject the request for redactions
3 for the reasons explained in my order. And as I explained in
4 overruling the objection to paragraphs 39 to 45, Kate's
5 testimony and her statement are relevant to sentencing which
6 I've indicated she may give. And with that, there's objections
7 pertaining to fine and assets and the like. I think we can
8 turn to those when we get to the fine. Mr. Everdell, okay with
9 that?
10 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. So we'll delay the
11 offense level calculation objections and the ones related to
12 the financial penalties for now?
13 THE COURT: Yes, precisely, and we'll pick those up.
14 I think otherwise that's it for what I understand to be
15 continuing objections after probation responded to your
16 requests and assertions. Agree with that, Mr. Everdell?
17 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, the only one that I would
18 highlight is there was an objection, I believe it's framed
19 according to paragraph 173, which deals with the financial
20 penalties. The government made in their response some
21 representations that we take issue with, but if you're planning
22 on covering that later, we can reserve that till later because
23 it does deal with the financial penalties.
24 THE COURT: Yes, I have objections to 172, 178, 192
25 and 193.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. ...
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021562
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document