HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018477.jpg

2.38 MB

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Personal narrative / exhibit from house oversight investigation
File Size: 2.38 MB
Summary

This document, labeled 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018477', is a personal narrative describing the author's BDSM preferences and communication styles. The author contrasts their 'improvisational' approach with a former partner's 'scripted' style and details how using a checklist helped bridge their differences. The document does not contain any names, dates, or direct references to Jeffrey Epstein or related individuals.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Unnamed Author/Narrator Author
The author of the text, describing their personal experiences and preferences regarding BDSM relationships and commun...
Unnamed Gentleman / Scripty Guy Former Partner
A man described as 'really, really awesome' with whom the author had a brief relationship 'last year'. He preferred a...
Unnamed 'guy' Acquaintance/Teacher
A person mentioned in the first section from whom the author 'learned a lot' about low-pressure sexual communication.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight
Referenced in the document's footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018477', indicating it is likely an exhibit or evidence from a U...

Timeline (2 events)

'last year' (relative to writing)
The author had a brief relationship with a 'gentleman' ('Scripty Guy').
Not specified
Not specified
The author and their partner ('Scripty Guy') went through a BDSM checklist together to discuss their sexual preferences.
Not specified

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as a potential location for an activity.

Relationships (2)

Unnamed Author/Narrator Former romantic/sexual partner Unnamed Gentleman / Scripty Guy
The author states, 'I had one brief relationship last year with a gentleman who is really, really awesome... We stopped seeing each other for unrelated reasons soon afterwards...'
Unnamed Author/Narrator Informal teacher/student Unnamed 'guy'
The author states, 'Yeah, I learned a lot from that guy.'

Key Quotes (3)

"I can either take care of that in the bathroom, or I can do it here. If I do it here, then you can help me along, or not. I'd especially appreciate it if you could talk dirty while I jerk off, but it's your decision."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018477.jpg
Quote #1
"I tend to take an "improvisational" approach to my encounters, whereas he tends to take a "scripted" approach."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018477.jpg
Quote #2
"Seriously, by the time we were done going through the whole list, I could not wait to have sex with that guy."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018477.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,244 characters)

to sleep. I can either take care of that in the bathroom, or I can do it here. If I do it here, then you can help me along, or not. I'd especially appreciate it if you could talk dirty while I jerk off, but it's your decision."
Talk about low pressure! Yeah, I learned a lot from that guy.
* * *
2) Scripts and Lists. I had one brief relationship last year with a gentleman who is really, really awesome -- but we have very different approaches to S&M. We had a hard time communicating about it... honestly, if he hadn't been such an awesome guy, I would probably have given up on the relationship after a couple nights together. We were great at having extensive theoretical conversations about sexuality, but when it came down to actually having sex with each other, things got puzzling. We had difficulty predicting, understanding, and initiating with each other.
I'm not sure what made it so hard. I think, mostly, we just brought really different assumptions to the table. I tend to take an "improvisational" approach to my encounters, whereas he tends to take a "scripted" approach. He's into doing stuff like rearranging the furniture, taking on specific roles (e.g. teacher and student), using costumes and props, and knowing exactly what will be said beforehand.
Me, I like going free-form. I talk to my partner about hard limits (things we absolutely don't want to do); I talk to him about things we really like; and we set a safeword. I'm usually okay with diving in from there. If he wants a more structured conversation, I'm glad to have one (and sometimes, especially when I'm dominant, I'll ask for more conversation myself). But generally, I like seeing how things go based on a very loose set of guidelines, and making minor adjustments during the encounter, then evaluating the situation afterwards.
One of the reasons I like doing this is that unexpected things happen. On the flip side, there's also more room for experiences that aren't very exciting. I think I'm more likely to have disjointed or confusing encounters than a lot of other BDSMers I know, although maybe I'm just falling prey to the bias of assuming other people are doing better than I am. And Scripty Guy in particular really doesn't like disjoint and confusion -- he likes knowing what's going to happen.
Late in the relationship, I suggested that we try going through a checklist. When people use these checklists, a lot of the time they just write their rating for each act, and give them to each other to read. What we did instead was go through the checklist together and discuss what we found hot, what was not, and whatever else came to mind.
This worked amazingly well -- it totally bridged our theoretical gap and it was a turn-on in itself! (Seriously, by the time we were done going through the whole list, I could not wait to have sex with that guy.) The conversation also helped me figure out the scripted vs. un-scripted difference between us.
We stopped seeing each other for unrelated reasons soon afterwards, and they were good reasons, but it seemed like a shame; I felt like we'd only just started figuring things out. I'm not sure how well our S&M styles would have ultimately meshed, but I was curious
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018477

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document