DOJ-OGR-00019037.jpg

528 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 528 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The testimony focuses on the procedures for scheduling flights for Mr. Epstein during the 1990s. Rodgers confirms that while he occasionally spoke with Mr. Epstein or Ghislaine directly, the primary point of contact for scheduling was typically Epstein's secretary in New York.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Rodgers Witness
Mentioned in the header as the person undergoing cross-examination. Provides the answers ('A.') in the transcript.
Mr. Epstein
Mentioned as someone who would occasionally speak to the witness (Rodgers) to schedule flights or inform them of an u...
Ghislaine
Mentioned as someone the witness (Rodgers) would occasionally speak to about flights.
Epstein's secretary Secretary
Described as the person the witness (Rodgers) usually spoke to about scheduling flights during the 1990s.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.

Timeline (2 events)

1990s
The process of scheduling flights, which involved speaking to Mr. Epstein, Ghislaine, or, most commonly, Epstein's secretary in New York.
New York
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Rodgers Unnamed Questioner

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as the location of Epstein's secretary.

Relationships (3)

Rodgers professional Mr. Epstein
Rodgers would speak to Mr. Epstein about scheduling flights, indicating an employee-employer or contractor relationship related to aviation.
Rodgers professional Ghislaine
Rodgers would occasionally speak to Ghislaine about flights, suggesting they worked together in some capacity.
Rodgers professional Epstein's secretary
Rodgers' testimony states that speaking to Epstein's secretary was the usual method for scheduling flights in the 1990s, indicating a regular professional interaction.

Key Quotes (2)

"But during the time period of the 1990s, it was usually the case that you were speaking to Epstein's secretary in New York about scheduling flights, isn't that right?"
Source
— Questioner (A question establishing the primary point of contact for flight scheduling during the 1990s.)
DOJ-OGR-00019037.jpg
Quote #1
"Yes, more often than not."
Source
— Rodgers (The witness's confirmation that Epstein's secretary was the usual contact for scheduling flights in the 1990s.)
DOJ-OGR-00019037.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,283 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 175 of 262 1886
LC8VMAX6 Rodgers - cross
1 needed to fly somewhere, right?
2 A. Yes.
3 Q. And you'd usually get about a few days' notice, maybe a
4 day's notice, if it's short notice; is that right?
5 A. Correct.
6 Q. And there were several different people who would speak to
7 you about scheduling flights, right?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. I think you mentioned on your direct that you would
10 occasionally speak to Mr. Epstein himself to schedule flights
11 or he would let you know a flight was happening, right?
12 A. Yes, he would let us know.
13 Q. If he was leaving the plane on one particular time and he
14 knew he was going to go somewhere, say, in a day or two, he
15 would mention to you we're going to fly to so-and-so
16 destination two days from now?
17 A. That is correct.
18 Q. And you said you would occasionally speak to Ghislaine as
19 well about flights, right?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. But during the time period of the 1990s, it was usually the
22 case that you were speaking to Epstein's secretary in New York
23 about scheduling flights, isn't that right?
24 A. Yes, more often than not.
25 Q. And in the '90s, I think you mentioned you didn't have a
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00019037

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document