HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011830.jpg

2.17 MB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
4
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book manuscript / memoir draft (house oversight evidence)
File Size: 2.17 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page from a draft of Ehud Barak's memoir (indicated by the header '/ BARAK / 73'), stamped as evidence by the House Oversight Committee. It details high-stakes peace negotiations mediated by President Clinton involving Yasser Arafat, specifically focusing on land swaps in the West Bank, control of the Jordan Valley, and the critical contention over the status of Jerusalem. The narrator (Barak) expresses skepticism regarding Arafat's counter-conditions despite Clinton's optimism.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ehud Barak Narrator / Israeli Prime Minister (Implied)
The header '/ BARAK /' and the first-person narrative discussing Israeli sovereignty implies this is Ehud Barak recou...
Bill Clinton US President / Mediator
Mediating negotiations between the narrator (Barak) and Arafat.
Yasser Arafat Palestinian Leader
Negotiating terms regarding the West Bank and Jerusalem.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
Labor Party
Mentioned in the final sentence fragment ('It was under a Labor').

Timeline (3 events)

1948
Division of Jerusalem
Jerusalem
1967
Six-Day War
Jerusalem / Old City
Israel Jordan
Historical (Likely July 2000)
Peace Negotiations (Camp David Summit)
Camp David (Implied)

Locations (4)

Location Context
Area where a security zone was proposed.
Land being negotiated for a Palestinian state.
Described as the most difficult issue and the centerpiece of the state.
Part of Jerusalem, site of the ancient Jewish temple.

Relationships (2)

Ehud Barak Diplomatic/Negotiation Bill Clinton
Direct dialogue and strategy discussions regarding the peace plan.
Bill Clinton Mediator/Negotiator Yasser Arafat
Clinton shuttling messages and offers between Barak and Arafat.

Key Quotes (4)

"We will extend Israeli sovereignty over the major settlement blocs."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011830.jpg
Quote #1
"And the confrontation will begin."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011830.jpg
Quote #2
"Everything would be contingent on an unspecified, 'acceptable outcome on Jerusalem.'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011830.jpg
Quote #3
"Clinton seemed, if not completely revived, considerably more upbeat when he came back to see me an hour later."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011830.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,413 characters)

/ BARAK / 73
explicit. I told President Clinton I could speak only for how I would respond if a
state was indeed declared without a peace deal. “We will extend Israeli sovereignty
over the major settlement blocs. We will establish a security zone in the Jordan
valley, and let them know that there will be a heavy price should they attack any of
the outlying settlements.” In other words, Palestinian unilateral action would
prompt unilateral Israeli action. “And the confrontation will begin.”
* * *
Clinton seemed, if not completely revived, considerably more upbeat when he
came back to see me an hour later. He told me that he had received the
Palestinians’ answer. The way he described it to me, Arafat had agreed to leave
President Clinton to decide the amount of West Bank land that would go to a
Palestinian state, a figure he now told me that he was assuming would end up at
around 90 to 92 percent. The trade-off, he said, would be a limited, “symbolic”
land swap. Arafat also wanted control of the Jordan Valley, but had agreed to
begin negotiating on Israeli security needs there as soon as possible. Then, came
Arafat’s counter-conditions, which appeared to bother the President much less than
they did me. Everything would be contingent on an unspecified, “acceptable
outcome on Jerusalem.” And despite Clinton’s emphasis that any meaningful
agreement had to include a formal declaration that the Israeli-Palestinian conflict
was “over,” Arafat was insisting that could come only after the terms of whatever
we agreed were fully implemented.
Still, it was at least a step forward. Clinton seemed genuinely encouraged, and I
didn’t want to risk closing off this first chink of light. I suggested, for instance, that
we could address Arafat’s reluctance about an “end of conflict” statement by
providing an American guarantee that the terms of the deal would be implemented.
Still, it very soon became clear that any hope of real progress rested on by far
the most difficult issue: Jerusalem. Across party boundaries, even across divisions
between religious and secular, nearly all Israelis viewed the city as not just our
capital, but the centerpiece of the state. It had been divided after 1948. The Old
City, and the site of the ancient Jewish temple, had been under Jordanian rule for
19 years when our forces recaptured it in the Six-Day War. It was under a Labor
359
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011830

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document