DOJ-OGR-00030288.tif
46.1 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
8
Events
4
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court document / legal filing
File Size:
46.1 KB
Summary
This document, a court filing from 2009, details allegations and background information related to 'Jane Doe No. 4', a plaintiff in a case against Epstein. It mentions police reports concerning domestic violence incidents involving Jane Doe No. 4 and her then-boyfriend Vinyard, and also states that Jane Doe No. 4 visited Epstein's house on multiple occasions and is now seeking millions in damages, with Epstein asserting his right to be present at depositions.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein | Defendant / Alleged abuser |
Subject of allegations, accused of improper behavior, seeking to be present at depositions.
|
| Jane Doe No. 4 | Plaintiff / Alleged victim |
Subject of police reports, alleged victim of domestic violence by Vinyard, involved in an accident with Vinyard, went...
|
| Vinyard | Boyfriend of Jane Doe No. 4 |
Filed a battery report against him, physically and verbally abusive to Jane Doe No. 4, arrested in December 2003 for ...
|
| Jen | Friend of Jane Doe No. 4 |
Died in an automobile accident involving drinking.
|
| Dr. Hall | Referenced |
Mentioned in 'See infra. Dr. Hall', likely related to further information or testimony.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FLSD Docket |
Where documents were entered.
|
Timeline (8 events)
2003-12
Vinyard arrested for reckless driving and leaving the scene of an accident with Jane Doe No. 4.
2004-09
Domestic violence file opened regarding Vinyard and Jane Doe No. 4.
Ex-boyfriend of Jane Doe No. 4 died in a DUI accident.
Jane Doe No. 4 went to Epstein's house on several occasions.
Psychiatric sessions for Jane Doe No. 4 at age sixteen or seventeen.
Jane Doe No. 4
psychiatrists
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jane Doe No. 4 indicates she went there on several occasions.
|
Relationships (4)
Jane Doe No. 4 went to Epstein's house on several occasions and is now pursuing claims.
Police reports, battery report, domestic violence file, serious relationship started in January 2002, Vinyard grabbed her by the neck, spit on her, called her a cheater, physically and verbally abusive, involved in an accident.
Ex-boyfriend died in a DUI accident.
Jen was a 'good friend' who died in an accident.
Key Quotes (1)
"Plaintiffs' depositions can only occur one time, no "second bite" absent a court order."Source
DOJ-OGR-00030288.tif
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,245 characters)
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 305-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/17/2009 Page 7 of 11
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 296 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2009 Page 7 of 33
Page 7
D. Spoke with two psychiatrists when she was sixteen or seventeen (before this lawsuit!) and did not reference Epstein, but did reference her boyfriend and family issues.
17. There are police reports that reflect that:
A. In September 2004, a battery report was filed regarding Jane Doe No. 4 and Vinyard based on an argument where he grabbed her by the neck and began spitting on her and calling her a cheater.
B. Also in September 2004, there was a domestic violence file opened where Vinyard was physically and verbally abusive to Jane Doe No. 4, his girlfriend at the time. There is reference that the two started a serious relationship in January 2002, when she was only fourteen (14) years old.
C. Vinyard was arrested in December 2003, and charged with reckless driving and leaving the scene of the accident with Jane Doe No. 4, when their vehicle hit a tree and they fled.
18. Moreover, an ex-boyfriend of Jane Doe No. 4 died in a DUI accident and it took her two years to get over his death, and another good friend of hers, "Jen," died in an automobile accident involving drinking. Within her Amended Complaint and Answers to Interrogatories, she indicates that she went to Epstein's house on several occasions. However, at no time did she call the police, at no time did she report any traumatic or severe emotional trauma, nor alleged coercion, force or improper behavior by Epstein until she got a "lawyer" and is now pursuing claims for millions of dollars. Epstein's assistance to his attorneys at these depositions regarding the above issues is not only a constitutional due process right afforded to him but essential given the fact that this court has ruled that Plaintiffs' depositions can only occur one time, no "second bite" absent a court order.
19. Given the breadth of the allegations made against Epstein and the substantial damages sought, Epstein has an unequivocal and constitutional right to be present at any deposition such that he can assist his counsel with the defense of these cases. See infra. Dr. Hall
03956-11000
: DOJ-OGR-00030288
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 296 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/11/2009 Page 7 of 33
Page 7
D. Spoke with two psychiatrists when she was sixteen or seventeen (before this lawsuit!) and did not reference Epstein, but did reference her boyfriend and family issues.
17. There are police reports that reflect that:
A. In September 2004, a battery report was filed regarding Jane Doe No. 4 and Vinyard based on an argument where he grabbed her by the neck and began spitting on her and calling her a cheater.
B. Also in September 2004, there was a domestic violence file opened where Vinyard was physically and verbally abusive to Jane Doe No. 4, his girlfriend at the time. There is reference that the two started a serious relationship in January 2002, when she was only fourteen (14) years old.
C. Vinyard was arrested in December 2003, and charged with reckless driving and leaving the scene of the accident with Jane Doe No. 4, when their vehicle hit a tree and they fled.
18. Moreover, an ex-boyfriend of Jane Doe No. 4 died in a DUI accident and it took her two years to get over his death, and another good friend of hers, "Jen," died in an automobile accident involving drinking. Within her Amended Complaint and Answers to Interrogatories, she indicates that she went to Epstein's house on several occasions. However, at no time did she call the police, at no time did she report any traumatic or severe emotional trauma, nor alleged coercion, force or improper behavior by Epstein until she got a "lawyer" and is now pursuing claims for millions of dollars. Epstein's assistance to his attorneys at these depositions regarding the above issues is not only a constitutional due process right afforded to him but essential given the fact that this court has ruled that Plaintiffs' depositions can only occur one time, no "second bite" absent a court order.
19. Given the breadth of the allegations made against Epstein and the substantial damages sought, Epstein has an unequivocal and constitutional right to be present at any deposition such that he can assist his counsel with the defense of these cases. See infra. Dr. Hall
03956-11000
: DOJ-OGR-00030288
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document