This document is a court transcript from a voir dire proceeding filed on March 24, 2022. A judge questions a potential juror about their personal habits, media consumption, and past affiliations to determine their fitness for jury duty. The juror affirms they can be fair and impartial, and the two counsel present, Ms. Pomerantz and Ms. Sternheim, decline to ask any questions.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
The individual questioning the potential juror during a voir dire proceeding.
|
| Unnamed Juror | Potential Juror |
The individual being questioned by the court to determine their suitability for jury duty.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Counsel |
Addressed by the court, declines to ask the juror any questions.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Counsel |
Addressed by the court, declines to ask the juror any questions.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the name of the court reporting agency, indicating the jurisdiction of the court.
|
"I love to travel and hang out with friends."Source
"In these questions, I have tried to, of course, get a sense of whether you can be fair to both sides in this case. Any doubt about your ability to do that?"Source
"Other than what I have asked you, do you have any reason to think that you can't be fair and impartial here?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,145 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document