DOJ-OGR-00013875.jpg
589 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
589 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a discussion between a judge and attorneys about a proposed stipulation. The stipulation would establish the timing of ownership for a property at 44 Kinnerton, which would then be used to argue the credibility of testimonies from Ms. Maxwell and a witness named Kate regarding when Ms. Maxwell resided there.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal discussion, suggesting a stipulation regarding property ownership timing.
|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Subject of a deposition where she stated she lived at Kinnerton starting in '92 or '93. Her testimony is being discus...
|
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Represents the government and indicates a probable agreement to the Court's proposed stipulation.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
An attorney in the proceeding who needs to confer with his team before agreeing to the stipulation.
|
| Kate | Witness |
A person whose testimony is being discussed as potentially inaccurate or false regarding when Ms. Maxwell lived at a ...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion between the Court and attorneys about a potential stipulation regarding the ownership timing of 44 Kinnerton to address conflicting testimonies from Ms. Maxwell and a witness named Kate.
Courtroom
Ms. Maxwell gave a deposition stating she lived at Kinnerton beginning in '92 or '93.
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
A property whose ownership timing is the subject of a proposed stipulation.
|
|
|
The specific address of the Kinnerton property mentioned by the Court.
|
Relationships (3)
Mr. Rohrbach addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and participates in the legal discussion.
Mr. Everdell addresses the Court as 'Judge' and discusses legal matters in the proceeding.
Kate provided testimony regarding her belief about where Ms. Maxwell lived, suggesting some form of acquaintance or knowledge of her life.
Key Quotes (3)
"I think what makes sense here to talk about is a stipulation as to the timing of ownership of the Kinnerton -- 44 Kinnerton, the timing of ownership."Source
— THE COURT
(Proposing a method to handle conflicting information about property ownership and residency.)
DOJ-OGR-00013875.jpg
Quote #1
"It sounds like that gives you what you want, which was the fact of ownership timing from which you can argue to the jury that because she didn't own it until a certain date, she couldn't have lived there before that date."Source
— THE COURT
(Explaining the strategic advantage of the proposed stipulation to one of the legal parties.)
DOJ-OGR-00013875.jpg
Quote #2
"And you can then argue, therefore, Kate wasn't accurate or testified falsely or however you want to phrase it, that she believed Ms. Maxwell lived there prior to '97."Source
— THE COURT
(Outlining how the stipulation could be used to impeach the testimony of the witness, Kate.)
DOJ-OGR-00013875.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,502 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 16 of 246 2311
LCGVMAX1
LCGVMAX1
1 address for the first time she went to the defendant's house,
2 at most. That's minimal impeachment value.
3 THE COURT: I think what makes sense here to talk
4 about is a stipulation as to the timing of ownership of the
5 Kinnerton -- 44 Kinnerton, the timing of ownership. And then
6 that can come in with the government's deposition -- with the
7 deposition of Ms. Maxwell saying she lived there beginning in
8 '92 or '93. Then both sides can argue to the jury what they
9 want.
10 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.
11 The government would -- I'd like to confer with the
12 team, but I think the government would probably agree to a
13 stipulation that included both the ownership fact and the
14 deposition testimony, so they'll both come in.
15 MR. EVERDELL: We'll have to confer on this, Judge,
16 but I understand what the Court's position is.
17 THE COURT: Okay. It sounds like that gives you what
18 you want, which was the fact of ownership timing from which you
19 can argue to the jury that because she didn't own it until a
20 certain date, she couldn't have lived there before that date.
21 And you can then argue, therefore, Kate wasn't accurate or
22 testified falsely or however you want to phrase it, that she
23 was in that -- she believed Ms. Maxwell lived there prior to
24 '97.
25 MR. EVERDELL: Just to preview for the Court, I think
2 at most. That's minimal impeachment value.
3 THE COURT: I think what makes sense here to talk
4 about is a stipulation as to the timing of ownership of the
5 Kinnerton -- 44 Kinnerton, the timing of ownership. And then
6 that can come in with the government's deposition -- with the
7 deposition of Ms. Maxwell saying she lived there beginning in
8 '92 or '93. Then both sides can argue to the jury what they
9 want.
10 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.
11 The government would -- I'd like to confer with the
12 team, but I think the government would probably agree to a
13 stipulation that included both the ownership fact and the
14 deposition testimony, so they'll both come in.
15 MR. EVERDELL: We'll have to confer on this, Judge,
16 but I understand what the Court's position is.
17 THE COURT: Okay. It sounds like that gives you what
18 you want, which was the fact of ownership timing from which you
19 can argue to the jury that because she didn't own it until a
20 certain date, she couldn't have lived there before that date.
21 And you can then argue, therefore, Kate wasn't accurate or
22 testified falsely or however you want to phrase it, that she
23 was in that -- she believed Ms. Maxwell lived there prior to
24 '97.
25 MR. EVERDELL: Just to preview for the Court, I think
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013875
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document