This document is a court transcript from a case where the judge and counsel discuss how to communicate with a deliberating jury about their schedule. The judge proposes a note asking if the jury wants to deliberate the next day, "December 23rd". After a recess, the court receives a note back from the jury requesting the testimonies of individuals named Jane and Kate Wong.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge speaking in the transcript, addressing counsel and reading notes.
|
| MS. COMEY | Counsel (implied) |
A participant in the court proceedings who responds to the judge's proposed note to the jury.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Counsel (implied) |
A participant in the court proceedings who responds to the judge and comments on the jury's note.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Mentioned as the signatory on a proposed note from the court to the jury.
|
| Jane | Witness (implied) |
Her testimony is requested by the jury in a note to the court.
|
| Wong, Kate | Witness (implied) |
Her testimony is requested by the jury in a note to the court.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
"Hello, jury. If your deliberations are not completed today, do you wish to deliberate tomorrow, Thursday, December 23rd?"Source
"May we please have the following testimonies in a binder." The first one is Jane, Wong, Kate."Source
"Judge, I'm not reading the note, but they got Jane. It wasn't in a binder."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,358 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document