DOJ-OGR-00017307.jpg

565 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 565 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge ('The Court') and an attorney ('Mr. Everdell'). They are discussing the legal definition of the word "entice," with the judge citing precedent from the cases *United States v. Almonte* and *United States v. Dupigny*. Mr. Everdell attempts to recall another case related to a Rule 29 argument he previously made.

People (6)

Name Role Context
The Court Judge
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the case.
Mr. Everdell Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the Court.
Almonte Defendant
Mentioned as the defendant in the case United States v. Almonte.
Dupigny Defendant
Mentioned as the defendant in the case United States v. Dupigny.
Mr. Rohrbach
Mentioned by the Court as someone who previously referenced a definition.
Broxmeyer
Mentioned by Mr. Everdell in reference to a case cited to the Court.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion during a court case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE) about the legal definition of 'entice' and recalling precedent from other cases.
courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned by Mr. Everdell as the location where the proceeding is taking place, noting a lack of WiFi.

Relationships (1)

Mr. Everdell professional The Court
Mr. Everdell addresses The Court as 'your Honor', indicating a formal, professional relationship between an attorney and a judge in a courtroom setting.

Key Quotes (1)

""entice" means to attract, induce, or lure using hope or desire."
Source
— The Court (The Court is providing a legal definition of the word "entice" as established in previous cases.)
DOJ-OGR-00017307.jpg
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,400 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 3 of 29 3120
LCRVMAXT
THE COURT: Just a moment.
Trying to get my things up and running here.
Yes.
MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
So I think there are -- if I recall, there are cases that do try to define those words in a little bit more detail.
I don't have those cases at my fingertips and I'm trying to get them online, but I don't think we have WiFi in the courtroom.
THE COURT: I have one. United States v. Almonte, 16 CR 670; and United States v. Dupigny, 19 CR 528, gave a little bit of elaboration on that series of words.
For "entice" -- I think this is true for both those cases, I'll confirm -- they provided in the charge that "entice" means to attract, induce, or lure using hope or desire. I think I recall, Mr. Rohrbach, you referenced that definition at one point when we were discussing an issue, if I'm not mistaken.
Is that what you had in mind, Mr. Everdell?
MR. EVERDELL: The one I was thinking of, I think, is the one -- I'm trying to find the name, is it -- should be in my notes. Just give me one minute, your Honor. The one where we were arguing the Rule 29, which I cited to the Court, Broxmeyer, I think; am I correct about that?
THE COURT: I don't know. This was the causation -- you wanted me to define with respect to causation, is that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017307

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document