This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge ('The Court') and an attorney ('Mr. Everdell'). They are discussing the legal definition of the word "entice," with the judge citing precedent from the cases *United States v. Almonte* and *United States v. Dupigny*. Mr. Everdell attempts to recall another case related to a Rule 29 argument he previously made.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the case.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the Court.
|
| Almonte | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in the case United States v. Almonte.
|
| Dupigny | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in the case United States v. Dupigny.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach |
Mentioned by the Court as someone who previously referenced a definition.
|
|
| Broxmeyer |
Mentioned by Mr. Everdell in reference to a case cited to the Court.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned by Mr. Everdell as the location where the proceeding is taking place, noting a lack of WiFi.
|
""entice" means to attract, induce, or lure using hope or desire."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,400 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document