DOJ-OGR-00013591.jpg
616 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court notice (notice of filing of official transcript)
File Size:
616 KB
Summary
Court document filed on August 10, 2022, notifying parties that an official transcript for a conference held on December 9, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell has been filed. The document outlines the deadlines and procedures for requesting redactions of personal data identifiers before the transcript becomes publicly available.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Named defendant in Case No. 20-cr-330
|
| Speer | Court Reporter/Transcriber |
Signatory certifying the transcript filing
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Venue of the legal proceedings
|
|
| United States of America |
Prosecuting party
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Implied by footer 'DOJ-OGR'
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Court location
|
Relationships (1)
Case caption listing USA as Plaintiff and Maxwell as Defendant
Key Quotes (3)
"Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a CONFERENCE held on 12/9/21 has been filed"Source
DOJ-OGR-00013591.jpg
Quote #1
"Redaction responsibilities apply to the attorneys of record or pro se parties"Source
DOJ-OGR-00013591.jpg
Quote #2
"This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social Security numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013591.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,524 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 758 Filed 08/10/22 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
UNITED STATES OF AM )
USA / Plaintiff(s) )
)
v. ) Case No.: 20-cr-330
)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, )
Defendant(s) )
)
)
USA / Plaintiff(s) )
)
v. ) Case No.: 20-cr-330
)
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, )
Defendant(s) )
)
)
NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT
Notice is hereby given that an official transcript of a )NFERENC held on 12/9/21
has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter.
has been filed by the court reporter/transcriber in the above-captioned matter.
Redaction responsibilities apply to the attorneys of record or pro se parties, even if the person requesting
the transcript is a judge or a member of the public or media.
the transcript is a judge or a member of the public or media.
The parties have seven (7) calendar days from the date of filing of this NOTICE to file with the court
any NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION of this transcript. A copy of said NOTICE must also
be served on the court reporter. If no such NOTICE is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically
available to the public without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days.
any NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST REDACTION of this transcript. A copy of said NOTICE must also
be served on the court reporter. If no such NOTICE is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically
available to the public without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days.
This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social Security
numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
5.2, and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1. Parties wishing to request redaction of other information
may proceed by motion.
numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
5.2, and Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 49.1. Parties wishing to request redaction of other information
may proceed by motion.
I (we) certify that the foregoing is a correct transcript from the record of proceedings in the above-
entitled matter.
entitled matter.
speer
Court Reporter/Transcriber Date
Court Reporter/Transcriber Date
DOJ-OGR-00013591
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document