This document is page 3 of a court order filed on September 2, 2020, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the Defendant's request to modify a protective order to disclose documents to judicial officers in other civil proceedings, characterizing her arguments as 'vague, speculative, and conclusory.' The text references factual information the Defendant wished to disclose, specifically regarding grand jury subpoenas issued to an unnamed entity ('Recipient') during the Government's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Refers to Ghislaine Maxwell (based on Case No. 1:20-cr-00330-AJN); requesting modification of protective order.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Investigation |
Mentioned regarding a grand jury investigation into him and possible co-conspirators.
|
| Recipient | Subpoena Recipient |
An unnamed entity that received grand jury subpoenas and cited civil protective orders as a barrier to compliance.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Opened grand jury investigation; issued subpoenas.
|
|
| The Court |
Denying the Defendant's request.
|
"But after fourteen single-spaced pages of heated rhetoric, the Defendant proffers no more than vague, speculative, and conclusory assertions as to why that is the case."Source
"The Defendant’s request is DENIED on this basis."Source
"Grand jury subpoenas were issued to an entity (“Recipient”) after the Government opened a grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators"Source
"The Recipient concluded that it could not turn over materials responsive to the grand jury subpoena absent a modification of the civil protective orders in the civil cases"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,077 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document