DOJ-OGR-00019442.jpg

713 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court order / legal filing (case 1:20-cr-00330-ajn)
File Size: 713 KB
Summary

This document is page 3 of a court order filed on September 2, 2020, in the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The Court denies the Defendant's request to modify a protective order to disclose documents to judicial officers in other civil proceedings, characterizing her arguments as 'vague, speculative, and conclusory.' The text references factual information the Defendant wished to disclose, specifically regarding grand jury subpoenas issued to an unnamed entity ('Recipient') during the Government's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his co-conspirators.

People (3)

Name Role Context
The Defendant Defendant
Refers to Ghislaine Maxwell (based on Case No. 1:20-cr-00330-AJN); requesting modification of protective order.
Jeffrey Epstein Subject of Investigation
Mentioned regarding a grand jury investigation into him and possible co-conspirators.
Recipient Subpoena Recipient
An unnamed entity that received grand jury subpoenas and cited civil protective orders as a barrier to compliance.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Government
Opened grand jury investigation; issued subpoenas.
The Court
Denying the Defendant's request.

Timeline (2 events)

2020-09-02
Court Order Filed (Document 52)
Court Docket
Unknown (prior to 2020-08-24)
Government opened grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and co-conspirators
N/A

Relationships (2)

The Government Investigator/Subject Jeffrey Epstein
Government opened a grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein
The Defendant Litigant Civil Cases
Defendant involved in 'issues being litigated in those civil matters'

Key Quotes (4)

"But after fourteen single-spaced pages of heated rhetoric, the Defendant proffers no more than vague, speculative, and conclusory assertions as to why that is the case."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019442.jpg
Quote #1
"The Defendant’s request is DENIED on this basis."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019442.jpg
Quote #2
"Grand jury subpoenas were issued to an entity (“Recipient”) after the Government opened a grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019442.jpg
Quote #3
"The Recipient concluded that it could not turn over materials responsive to the grand jury subpoena absent a modification of the civil protective orders in the civil cases"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019442.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,077 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 52 Filed 09/02/20 Page 3 of 5
case in other civil proceedings. She bases her request on the premise that disclosure of the
Documents to the relevant judicial officers is allegedly necessary to ensure the fair adjudication
of issues being litigated in those civil matters. But after fourteen single-spaced pages of heated
rhetoric, the Defendant proffers no more than vague, speculative, and conclusory assertions as to
why that is the case. She provides no coherent explanation of what argument she intends to
make before those courts that requires the presentation of the materials received in discovery in
this criminal matter under the existing terms of the protective order in this case. And she
furnishes no substantive explanation regarding the relevance of the Documents to decisions to be
made in those matters, let alone any explanation of why modifying the protective order in order
to allow such disclosure is necessary to ensure the fair adjudication of those matters. In sum, the
arguments the Defendant presents to the Court plainly fail to establish good cause. The
Defendant’s request is DENIED on this basis.
Indeed, good cause for the requested modification of the protective order is further
lacking because, as far as this Court can discern, the facts she is interested in conveying to the
judicial decisionmakers in the Civil Cases are already publicly available, including in the
Government’s docketed letter on this issue. See Dkt. No. 46. In the opening paragraph of her
reply letter dated August 24, 2020, the Defendant states that she is essentially seeking to disclose
under seal to certain judicial officers the following factual information:
1. Grand jury subpoenas were issued to an entity (“Recipient”) after the Government
opened a grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-
conspirators;
2. The Recipient concluded that it could not turn over materials responsive to the grand
jury subpoena absent a modification of the civil protective orders in the civil cases;
3
DOJ-OGR-00019442

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document