DOJ-OGR-00013844.jpg

510 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 510 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion about filing deadlines. An attorney for the defense, Mr. Everdell, negotiates with the judge to move up a submission deadline to Sunday, arguing it would make a difference for their case. The judge ultimately sets the deadline for Wednesday and admonishes the attorney for not raising the issue sooner.

People (4)

Name Role Context
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the transcript, setting deadlines for legal filings.
MR. EVERDELL Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, representing the defense and negotiating filing deadlines.
MS. MOE Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, agreeing with a proposed schedule.
MS. STERNHEIM Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, expressing thanks.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion in court to determine the schedule and deadlines for submitting legal papers.
Courtroom (implied)

Relationships (3)

THE COURT Professional MR. EVERDELL
The document shows a standard interaction between a judge and an attorney, with the judge setting deadlines and the attorney advocating for his client's position regarding the schedule.
MR. EVERDELL Professional MS. MOE
Both are attorneys present in the same hearing. Ms. Moe's comment "Yes, your Honor" appears to be in support of the scheduling discussion involving Mr. Everdell, suggesting they may be on the same legal team.
MR. EVERDELL Professional MS. STERNHEIM
Both are attorneys present in the same hearing. Ms. Sternheim's comment "Thank you" follows the court's scheduling decision, suggesting they are on the same legal team.

Key Quotes (3)

"You're asking for Monday; they can have to noon on Wednesday. I'll then have the papers briefed by noon on Wednesday."
Source
— THE COURT (Setting the deadline for the submission and briefing of papers.)
DOJ-OGR-00013844.jpg
Quote #1
"And then if that backs it up for a day, that will make a difference for the defense, your Honor, if we have our papers Sunday."
Source
— MR. EVERDELL (Arguing for an earlier submission deadline to benefit the defense's case.)
DOJ-OGR-00013844.jpg
Quote #2
"And again, if this is a significant issue, it should have been raised earlier if you wanted earlier resolution."
Source
— THE COURT (Expressing disapproval that the scheduling issue was not brought up sooner.)
DOJ-OGR-00013844.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,151 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 253 of 267
LCAVMAX8
rather than later.
THE COURT: Well, then it should have been raised
sooner rather than later. You're asking for Monday; they can
have to noon on Wednesday. I'll then have the papers briefed
by noon on Wednesday.
MR. EVERDELL: Okay. We can also back up the
schedule, your Honor. We can have it done by -- we'll do it
Sunday. And then if that backs it up for a day, that will make
a difference for the defense, your Honor, if we have our papers
Sunday.
THE COURT: Okay. Sunday to Tuesday?
MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.
THE COURT: To be clear, I don't imagine you'll get
resolution from me until --
MR. EVERDELL: I understand.
THE COURT: -- Wednesday.
MR. EVERDELL: Yes, I understand, your Honor.
THE COURT: And I can't guarantee what time that will
be.
MR. EVERDELL: Yes. I understand.
THE COURT: And again, if this is a significant issue,
it should have been raised earlier if you wanted earlier
resolution. You're looking at Wednesday evening, at the
earliest, resolution.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013844

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document