This legal document is a page from a court order denying a renewed motion by an individual named Maxwell for temporary release from confinement. The court relies on the 'law of the case' doctrine, stating that Maxwell has not provided a compelling reason, such as new evidence or a change in law, to justify reversing its prior decision. The court also dismisses Maxwell's arguments concerning a recent letter briefing and a written order by Judge Nathan, affirming the previous finding that Maxwell is a flight risk.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Litigant |
Subject of a renewed motion for temporary release, which the court is denying.
|
| Plugh | Party in a cited case |
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Plugh, 648 F.3d 118, 123 (2d Cir. 2011)'.
|
| Tenzer | Party in a cited case |
Mentioned in the case citation 'United States v. Tenzer, 213 F.3d 34, 39 (2d Cir. 2000)'.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Mentioned as having issued a recent written order and finding that Maxwell poses a flight risk.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| this Court | Judicial body |
The court authoring the decision, adhering to its prior ruling.
|
| District Court | Judicial body |
The court before which an 'additional letter briefing' was submitted.
|
| MDC | Detention facility |
Mentioned in the context of 'nighttime security checks' which were the subject of a letter briefing.
|
"As a general matter, this Court will adhere to its own decision at an earlier stage of the litigation."Source
"We have stated that we will not depart from this sound policy absent cogent or compelling reasons."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,393 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document