HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025559.jpg

1.61 MB

Extraction Summary

0
People
9
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Financial research report
File Size: 1.61 MB
Summary

This document is page 9 of a Morgan Stanley research report dated January 26, 2017, analyzing North American alternative asset managers (Apollo, Ares, Blackstone, Oaktree, KKR, Carlyle). It focuses on the potential financial impact of these companies converting to C-Corporations, specifically analyzing stock price upside/downside scenarios and tax implications. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was obtained during a Congressional investigation, likely related to scrutiny of Apollo Global Management's ties to Epstein, though Epstein is not named on this specific page.

Organizations (9)

Name Type Context
Morgan Stanley
Producer of the research report 'North America Insight'.
Apollo Global Management
Referred to as 'APO' or 'Apollo'. The report notes favorable risk/reward skew for APO.
Ares Management
Referred to as 'ARES'. Analyzed for fee-related earnings contribution.
Blackstone
Referred to as 'BX'. The report sees less favorable upside/downside skew for BX.
Oaktree Capital Management
Referred to as 'OAK'.
KKR
Referred to as 'KKR'. The report sees less favorable upside/downside skew for KKR.
The Carlyle Group
Referred to as 'CG'.
Thomson Reuters
Cited as a source for data in Exhibit 9.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025559'.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Region of focus for the research report.

Relationships (1)

Morgan Stanley Financial Analyst/Subject Apollo Global Management
Morgan Stanley is providing detailed financial analysis and stock predictions for Apollo (APO).

Key Quotes (3)

"For Apollo, we see that nearly the entire the increase in value in the upside case is driven by the expansion of the FRE multiple from 15x to 22.5x."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025559.jpg
Quote #1
"We see favorable risk/reward skew APO."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025559.jpg
Quote #2
"We see less favorable upside/downside skew for BX and KKR."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025559.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,867 characters)

Morgan Stanley | RESEARCH
NORTH AMERICA INSIGHT
tively adjust upward our multiple on future carried interest earnings by 2 turns. For Apollo, we see that nearly the entire the increase in value in the upside case is driven by the expansion of the FRE multiple from 15x to 22.5x.
2018 Impact: Upside case impact is +13% vs. current price on average and 3.8x multiple expansion to a fully taxed EPS. In our upside case scenario, we assume a 22.5x multiple on fee-related earnings in our SOTP. We see favorable risk/reward skew APO.
Downside case impact assumes no multiple expansion of any kind, and that the stocks trade at their same current P/E, however on lower, fully taxed EPS. This represents -18% average downside from current prices. While this is likely an unreasonable outcome this is the concern among some investors, given that the only certainty in the analysis is a higher tax drag and lower earnings. We see less favorable upside/downside skew for BX and KKR.
Exhibit 7:
We see the greatest contribution of fee-related earnings at ARES and APO as a percentage of pre-tax earnings
2018e Pre-Tax Earnings Contribution
[Chart Legend: Investment Income, Performance Fees, Core Fee Related Earnings]
[Chart Data Visualized for ARES, APO, BX, OAK, KKR, CG, Avg.]
Source: Company Documents, Morgan Stanley Research estimates
Note; Fee Related earnings are on MSe Core methodology, ARES Core FRE include BDC Part 1 Management fees that are typically excluded from MSe Core FRE definition
Exhibit 8:
On average we see potential for 3.7x turns of multiple expansion on in our upside case with fully taxed EPS at a 24% effective rate. This could drive +12% upside on average to current share prices
P/E Multiples for Alts: Potential Expansion
[Chart Legend: Total Multiple Expansion in C-Corp Upside Scenario (on fuly taxed EPS @ 24%), Current Multiple on 2018e EPS]
[Chart Data Visualized: ARES 14.3x/4.7x/19.0x, APO 11.3x/4.7x/15.4x, BX 8.9x/4.1x/12.5x, OAK 12.7x/4.0x/16.7x, KKR 9.9x/3.6x/14.6x, CG 8.5x/1.4x/9.8x, Avg 10.9x/3.7x/14.7x]
% Upside to Stock: ARES 9.2%, APO 26.5%, BX 9.3%, OAK 11.3%, KKR 10.7%, CG 7.5%, Avg 12.4%
Source: Company Data, Morgan Stanley Research estimates
Exhibit 9:
Summary Scenario Analysis: Potential upside/downside valuation and multiples impact if Alts convert to C-corp structure and pay a full 24% tax rate
[Table Header 1: Upside Case Assumptions: 1) Fully taxed earnings and carry receivable balance 2) 22.5x Multiple on core FRE 3) Multiple expansion on carry of two turns to an average of 9.5x 2018-20 avg. performance fee earnings]
[Table Header 2: Downside Case Assumptions: 1) Fully taxed earnings and carry receivable balance 2) 15.0x Multiple on Core FRE 3) No P/E multiple expansion on fully taxed EPS 4) Back into implied multiple on future carry of 5.6x on avg.]
Ticker | Current Price | Valuation (C-Corp Conversion) | Valuation Price/Fully Taxed EPS | Δ Current P/E vs. w/ 24% Taxed EPS | % Upside Price Change From Current | Valuation (C-Corp Conversion) | Valuation Price/Fully Taxed EPS | Δ Current P/E vs. w/ 24% Taxed EPS | % Downside Price Change From Current
APO | $36.42 | $46.07 | 14.6x | 4.7x | 26.5% | $31.20 | 9.9x | 0.0x | -14.3%
ARES | $24.70 | $27.18 | 19.1x | 4.8x | 10.0% | $17.95 | 12.6x | -1.7x | -27.3%
BX | $36.78 | $40.18 | 15.4x | 4.1x | 9.3% | $29.51 | 11.3x | 0.0x | -19.8%
CG | $25.60 | $27.52 | 9.8x | 1.4x | 7.5% | $23.62 | 8.5x | 0.0x | -7.7%
KKR | $24.40 | $27.01 | 12.5x | 3.6x | 10.7% | $19.21 | 8.9x | 0.0x | -21.3%
OAK | $45.20 | $50.31 | 16.7x | 4.0x | 11.3% | $38.39 | 12.7x | 0.0x | -15.1%
Average | | | 14.7x | 3.8x | 12.6% | | 10.7x | -0.3x | -17.6%
Median | | | 15.0x | 4.0x | 10.4% | | 10.6x | 0.0x | -17.4%
Source: Company Data, Thomson Reuters, Morgan Stanley Research estimates. Note: Price as of 1/26/2017
MORGAN STANLEY RESEARCH
9
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025559

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document