This document is page 9 of a Morgan Stanley research report dated January 26, 2017, analyzing North American alternative asset managers (Apollo, Ares, Blackstone, Oaktree, KKR, Carlyle). It focuses on the potential financial impact of these companies converting to C-Corporations, specifically analyzing stock price upside/downside scenarios and tax implications. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' Bates stamp, indicating it was obtained during a Congressional investigation, likely related to scrutiny of Apollo Global Management's ties to Epstein, though Epstein is not named on this specific page.
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Morgan Stanley |
Producer of the research report 'North America Insight'.
|
|
| Apollo Global Management |
Referred to as 'APO' or 'Apollo'. The report notes favorable risk/reward skew for APO.
|
|
| Ares Management |
Referred to as 'ARES'. Analyzed for fee-related earnings contribution.
|
|
| Blackstone |
Referred to as 'BX'. The report sees less favorable upside/downside skew for BX.
|
|
| Oaktree Capital Management |
Referred to as 'OAK'.
|
|
| KKR |
Referred to as 'KKR'. The report sees less favorable upside/downside skew for KKR.
|
|
| The Carlyle Group |
Referred to as 'CG'.
|
|
| Thomson Reuters |
Cited as a source for data in Exhibit 9.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025559'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Region of focus for the research report.
|
"For Apollo, we see that nearly the entire the increase in value in the upside case is driven by the expansion of the FRE multiple from 15x to 22.5x."Source
"We see favorable risk/reward skew APO."Source
"We see less favorable upside/downside skew for BX and KKR."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,867 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document