DOJ-OGR-00013688.jpg

512 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 512 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a portion of the cross-examination of a witness named A. Farmer. The court admits a single page document, Bates labeled AFarmer10472, as exhibit AF1 without objection from the government. Attorney Ms. Menninger then begins questioning the witness about a handwritten journal entry made before a trip to New York.

People (4)

Name Role Context
MS. MENNINGER Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, questioning a witness and interacting with the court.
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the proceedings and making rulings on evidence.
MS. POMERANTZ Attorney
Speaker in the transcript, representing the government's position on evidence.
A. Farmer Witness
Subject of the cross-examination, being questioned by Ms. Menninger.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
A court proceeding where evidence (AF1) is admitted and a witness (A. Farmer) is cross-examined.
Courtroom
A trip taken by the witness to New York, which occurred prior to a journal entry being discussed.
New York

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as a place the witness went to, in a question about a journal entry.

Relationships (4)

MS. MENNINGER Professional A. Farmer
Ms. Menninger is conducting a cross-examination of the witness, A. Farmer.
MS. MENNINGER Professional THE COURT
Ms. Menninger, an attorney, is addressing the judge ('your Honor') during a court proceeding.
MS. POMERANTZ Professional THE COURT
Ms. Pomerantz, an attorney, is addressing the judge ('your Honor') to state the government's position.
MS. MENNINGER Professional MS. POMERANTZ
Both are attorneys participating in the same court proceeding, likely as opposing counsel.

Key Quotes (3)

"Your Honor, as long as we're referring to just page 2, then the government does not believe any redactions are necessary. So it can be published."
Source
— MS. POMERANTZ (Stating the government's position on publishing a piece of evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00013688.jpg
Quote #1
"Page 2 of what I'm looking at will be now marked as AF1 and, without objection, I'll admit AF1, which is only page 2."
Source
— THE COURT (Formally admitting a document into evidence as exhibit AF1.)
DOJ-OGR-00013688.jpg
Quote #2
"So this is, I think as we just said, an entry that you made in the same journal before you went to New York?"
Source
— MS. MENNINGER (Questioning the witness about the context of a journal entry being presented as evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00013688.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,215 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 97 of 267 2125
LCACmax3
A. Farmer - cross
1 MS. MENNINGER: Of course.
2 THE COURT: And if not, we can unseal it.
3 MS. POMERANTZ: Your Honor, as long as we're referring
4 to just page 2, then the government does not believe any
5 redactions are necessary. So it can be published.
6 THE COURT: Why don't we do that. Why don't we make
7 page 2 AF1.
8 MS. MENNINGER: That's fine.
9 THE COURT: Page 2 of what I'm looking at will be now
10 marked as AF1 and, without objection, I'll admit AF1, which is
11 only page 2.
12 Let me just give the Bates that's at the bottom. You
13 want to just give that --
14 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor. It's Bates labeled
15 AFarmer10472.
16 THE COURT: That is the single page that I'm admitting
17 as AF1. And no objection to it being published?
18 MS. POMERANTZ: No objection, your Honor.
19 THE COURT: You may publish.
20 MS. MENNINGER: Thank you, your Honor.
21 BY MS. MENNINGER:
22 Q. So this is, I think as we just said, an entry that you made
23 in the same journal before you went to New York?
24 A. Correct.
25 Q. So it's your handwriting, et cetera?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013688

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document