HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029439.jpg

1.8 MB

Extraction Summary

0
People
1
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Tax bulletin / financial advisory report
File Size: 1.8 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a 2018 Tax Bulletin analyzing the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. It compares 2017 and 2018 laws regarding itemized deductions, retirement savings, AMT, and carried interest. The 'Observations' section specifically highlights how the new laws benefit high-wage earners in no-tax states like Florida while potentially increasing taxes for high earners in high-tax jurisdictions like New York City. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029439', indicating it is part of a congressional investigation.

Timeline (1 events)

2018
Tax Reform Signed Into Law
USA

Locations (3)

Location Context
Used as an example of a 'no-tax state' where high earners would see savings.
Used as an example of a high-tax jurisdiction.
Used as an example of a high-tax jurisdiction where high earners might see tax increases.

Key Quotes (4)

"Under the Act, there will be winners and losers on the personal income tax side."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029439.jpg
Quote #1
"For instance, a Florida taxpayer earning $1 million with moderate itemized deductions may see a tax savings of about $30,000 under the Act."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029439.jpg
Quote #2
"A taxpayer earning $3 million in New York City may see a significant tax increase: $44,000 under the Act"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029439.jpg
Quote #3
"A similar taxpayer in Florida would see a tax savings of about $91,000 under the Act"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029439.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,030 characters)

TAX BULLETIN 2018-1: TAX REFORM SIGNED INTO LAW
INDIVIDUAL TAXES (continued)
2017 Law
2018 Law
Itemized Deductions
Under the “Pease” limitation, up to 80% of most itemized deductions are lost when adjusted gross income exceeds $313,800 ($261,500 for single taxpayers)
Repeals the Pease limitation on itemized deductions
Mortgage interest deduction: $750,000 limit on acquisition indebtedness retained (principal or secondary residence); deduction for home equity loan repealed
Deduction for state and local income, sales tax and real property taxes limited to $10,000 in aggregate ($5,000 for married filing separately); deduction allowed for state and local taxes on trade or business or if related to production of income. Payment of income taxes in 2017 for a subsequent year would not be deductible in 2017.⁴
Deduction for medical expenses retained and liberalized for 2017 and 2018 ⁴
Retirement Savings
Contributions can be placed into deferred account, up to contribution cap
Unchanged
AMT
Parallel tax calculation with top rate of 28% and $84,500 exemption for married taxpayers ($54,300 others); phase out of exemption begins at $160,900 for married taxpayers ($120,700 others)
Retains and modifies AMT; exemptions raised to $109,400 (married) and $70,300 (others); phase-out of exemption begins at $1 million for married taxpayers ($500,000 others). ⁴
Carried Interest
Retains character as capital gain and eligible for preferential tax rates
Requires three-year holding period to attain long-term capital gains rate
Investment Surtax
3.8% tax on “net investment income”
Unchanged – continues to apply
OBSERVATIONS – INDIVIDUAL TAXES
Under the Act, there will be winners and losers on the personal income tax side. Generally, wage earners from no-tax states⁵ could see tax savings under the Act. For instance, a Florida taxpayer earning $1 million with moderate itemized deductions may see a tax savings of about $30,000 under the Act. A similar taxpayer in New York State may see a savings of about $3,500 according to our preliminary analysis..⁶
Conversely, very high-wage earners from high-tax states could see a higher tax bill. A taxpayer earning $3 million in New York City may see a significant tax increase: $44,000 under the Act, due in part to the loss of significant deductions. A similar taxpayer in Florida would see a tax savings of about $91,000 under the Act (primarily due to the lower top rate, elongated 35% tax bracket and regaining itemized deductions that are no longer phased-out), according to our preliminary analysis.
Married couples could fare worse than two single taxpayers with a similar amount of income. The so-called marriage penalty hits particularly hard under the new tax brackets. The penalty is also exacerbated by permitting married couples only a $10,000 state income/real estate tax deduction, but allowing each of two single filers a deduction in the same amount ($20,000 combined). Under the changes, a single taxpayer with $500,000 of wages
2
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029439

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document