This document is a page from a 2018 Tax Bulletin analyzing the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. It compares 2017 and 2018 laws regarding itemized deductions, retirement savings, AMT, and carried interest. The 'Observations' section specifically highlights how the new laws benefit high-wage earners in no-tax states like Florida while potentially increasing taxes for high earners in high-tax jurisdictions like New York City. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Document bears the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029439', indicating it is part of a congressional investigation.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Used as an example of a 'no-tax state' where high earners would see savings.
|
|
|
Used as an example of a high-tax jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Used as an example of a high-tax jurisdiction where high earners might see tax increases.
|
"Under the Act, there will be winners and losers on the personal income tax side."Source
"For instance, a Florida taxpayer earning $1 million with moderate itemized deductions may see a tax savings of about $30,000 under the Act."Source
"A taxpayer earning $3 million in New York City may see a significant tax increase: $44,000 under the Act"Source
"A similar taxpayer in Florida would see a tax savings of about $91,000 under the Act"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,030 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document