EFTA00027097.pdf
22.8 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
22.8 KB
Summary
This document is an email thread from August 12, 2019, two days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. CNN reporter Erica Orden emails a contact asking if prosecutors viewed the recent case against Epstein as a rebuke to the 2008 Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The recipient forwards this email to another party, asking for guidance on how to respond to what they perceive as an 'awfully strong statement.'
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Erica Orden | Reporter, CNN |
Sender of the original inquiry regarding Epstein and the NPA.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of inquiry |
Mentioned in the context of prosecutors bringing him to justice.
|
| [Redacted] | Attorney inquiry subject |
Erica Orden asks 'Who is [Redacted] attorney?'
|
| [Redacted] | Government Official/Recipient |
Recipient of the media inquiry who forwards it for guidance.
|
Relationships (1)
Orden emailing questions to the redacted recipient.
Key Quotes (2)
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (524 characters)
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: FW: my questions
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 18:32:32 +0000
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: FW: my questions
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 18:32:32 +0000
Let me know if there’s guidance you’d like for me to give her, seems like an awfully strong statement?
From: Orden, Erica
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 12:53 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: my questions
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2019 12:53 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: my questions
Is it fair to say prosecutors saw the case not only as a way to bring Epstein to justice but as a rebuke to the NPA?
Who is [REDACTED] attorney?
Erica Orden
Reporter, CNN
[REDACTED]
@eorden
Reporter, CNN
[REDACTED]
@eorden
EFTA00027097
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document