EFTA00029723.pdf

177 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 177 KB
Summary

This document is an email chain from August 2019 between Parvin Moyne of Akin Gump (representing Deutsche Bank) and redacted officials (likely SDNY prosecutors). The correspondence concerns the scheduling of an 'attorney proffer' regarding Jeffrey Epstein's relationship with the bank. Moyne proposes a presentation by Akin Gump and 'DB Legal' to overview Epstein's accounts, transactions, and findings from their internal investigation to assist the government in reviewing subpoena returns.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Parvin Daphne Moyne Partner, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Lawyer representing the bank (Deutsche Bank); coordinating document production and attorney proffer.
Thomas Moyer CC Recipient
Copied on all emails in the chain.
Jeffrey Epstein Subject of Investigation
Mentioned as the subject of the bank's internal investigation and the relationship being reviewed.
[Redacted] Government Official / Prosecutor
Recipient of the SDNY Production Index; likely SDNY staff given the subject line.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Law firm representing the bank.
DB Legal
Legal department of Deutsche Bank (implied by 'DB'), mentioned as participating in the proffer.
SDNY
Southern District of New York; mentioned in the subject line regarding document production.

Timeline (1 events)

2019-09
Proposed Attorney Proffer
New York (implied)
Parvin Moyne Akin Gump colleagues DB Legal representative SDNY officials (implied)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Address of Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP.

Relationships (2)

Parvin Moyne Legal Investigator Jeffrey Epstein
Parvin Moyne is conducting an internal investigation into Epstein's relationship with Deutsche Bank.
Parvin Moyne Legal Counsel to Regulator SDNY (implied)
Moyne is providing production indexes and proffers to the recipient (likely SDNY).

Key Quotes (3)

"Initially, we propose that the lawyers (myself, my colleagues at Akin Gump, and someone from DB Legal) deliver a presentation that provides an overview of Epstein’s relationship with the bank"
Source
EFTA00029723.pdf
Quote #1
"the different accounts affiliated with Epstein and the types of transactions found in the accounts."
Source
EFTA00029723.pdf
Quote #2
"We would also highlight various transactions that we have noted in our internal investigation."
Source
EFTA00029723.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (6,259 characters)

From: "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
To: "Moyne, Parvin" <[Redacted]>
Cc: "Moyer, Thomas" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: 2019.8.15 - SDNY Production Index.xlsx
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:45:05 +0000
Parvin,
Not a problem. We could do any time after noon on that Tuesday (the 10th) or any time on the Thursday (the 12th).
Would either of those work?
thanks,
[Redacted].
From: Moyne, Parvin <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 09:25
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: Moyer, Thomas <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: 2019.8.15 - SDNY Production Index.xlsx
[Redacted],
I'm so sorry for the inconvenience but those dates are not good on our end.
The following week is relatively clear. Might September 9th work? Or other dates that week?
Best,
Parvin
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 11:58 PM
To: Moyne, Parvin <[Redacted]>
Cc: Moyer, Thomas <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: 2019.8.15 - SDNY Production Index.xlsx
Parvin,
That makes good sense, thanks. Because of the scheduling issues I mentioned, we'd like to set it for a time in early September, if we can — is there a time during the afternoon of September 5 or the morning of September 6 that would work for you? We should be able to do either of those dates and times. Or if not, we can propose possible times the following week.
thank you,
[Redacted].
From: Moyne, Parvin <[Redacted]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 14:03
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: Moyer, Thomas <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: 2019.8.15 - SDNY Production Index.xlsx
[Redacted] –
Initially, we propose that the lawyers (myself, my colleagues at Akin Gump, and someone from DB Legal) deliver a presentation that provides an overview of Epstein’s relationship with the bank, the different accounts affiliated with Epstein and the types of transactions found in the accounts. We would also highlight various transactions that we have noted in our internal investigation. Our aim is that the attorney proffer would help you in sifting through the records we have provided so you can more readily identify whatever information you are most interested in. Following the proffer, if there are particular accounts or transactions of interest, we can identify the person within [Redacted] who can best answer questions on those areas and that person would then meet with you.
In terms of timing, I estimate 2-3 hours for the attorney proffer. (I think closer to 2 hours but I hate to underestimate.)
Best,
Parvin
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 8:14 PM
To: Moyne, Parvin <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: Moyer, Thomas <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: 2019.8.15 - SDNY Production Index.xlsx
Parvin,
Could you please let us know what format we should expect in terms of the proffer? That will help us with figuring out scheduling. I.e., do you expect to make an attorney proffer in the first instance, or should be expect to be meeting with [Redacted] personnel, etc? And approximately how long should we be planning to block out?
thanks,
[Redacted].
From: Moyne, Parvin <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 12:04
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: Moyer, Thomas <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: 2019.8.15 - SDNY Production Index.xlsx
Hi [Redacted] –
The proffer may be helpful in guiding you through the production. That said, we can be available whenever makes most sense on your ends.
We have time this week (Thursday or Friday afternoon) and next week (Monday – Wednesday), and we have time in September. If you give us a few options in terms of dates/times, we will sort out schedules on our ends.
Best
Parvin
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 1:59 PM
To: Moyne, Parvin <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: Moyer, Thomas <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: 2019.8.15 - SDNY Production Index.xlsx
**EXTERNAL Email**
Parvin,
We received the index, thank you. In terms of a proffer, what generally did you have in mind regarding timing? I think we'd like to have some time with the subpoena returns to get familiarized, and our team has a combination of travel and trials in the next couple weeks, but we could do early September if that works on your end. Thoughts?
thanks,
[Redacted].
From: Moyne, Parvin <[Redacted]>
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 09:48
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: Moyer, Thomas <[Redacted]>
Subject: 2019.8.15 - SDNY Production Index.xlsx
[Redacted], [Redacted] & [Redacted],
Please find attached an index to our productions to date. This is a work in progress – we will update it as we gather and produce additional documents.
Would you like to touch base later today about scheduling a proffer? We are free after 4 p.m.
Best,
Parvin
Parvin Daphne Moyne
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
One Bryant Park | New York, NY 10036-6745 | USA | Direct: +1 [Redacted] | Internal: [Redacted]
Fax: +1 [Redacted] | [Redacted] | akingump.com | Bio
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document