DOJ-OGR-00009417.jpg
435 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
435 KB
Summary
This court transcript details the questioning of a witness by the judge regarding a potential issue with Juror No. 1. The judge asks why the witness did not raise this issue, which they had discussed with Ms. Brune and Ms. Trzaskoma on May 12, at the time when another juror, Juror No. 11, was replaced due to a health emergency. The witness responds that it did not occur to them to raise the issue at that time.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein |
Mentioned at the top of the transcript page, possibly a case name or participant.
|
|
| THE WITNESS | Witness |
An unnamed individual being questioned by the court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
The presiding judge questioning the witness.
|
| Juror No. 11 | Juror |
A juror who was displaced during deliberations due to a health emergency.
|
| Ms. Brune |
An individual who participated in a discussion with the witness and Ms. Trzaskoma on May 12 regarding Juror No. 1.
|
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma |
An individual who participated in a discussion with the witness and Ms. Brune on May 12 regarding Juror No. 1.
|
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
The subject of a discussion on May 12 between the witness, Ms. Brune, and Ms. Trzaskoma.
|
| MR. OKULA |
An individual, likely an attorney, who asks to follow up with questions.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Displacement of Juror No. 11 during jury deliberations due to a health emergency. The juror was replaced with an alternate and the jury was directed to restart deliberations.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of a discussion on May 12 between the witness, Ms. Brune, and Ms. Trzaskoma.
|
Relationships (3)
The document is a transcript of the Court formally questioning the Witness in a legal proceeding.
They participated in a discussion on May 12 regarding a juror in the case.
They participated in a discussion on May 12 regarding a juror in the case.
Key Quotes (2)
"In the middle of jury deliberations, this Court displaced Juror No. 11 because of a health emergency, replaced him with an alternate after much discussion with counsel and over the objection of the government, and directed the jury to restart its jury deliberations. Did you give any consideration at that time to raising the issue that you discussed in the park on May 12 with Ms. Brune and Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1?"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge questioning the witness about their inaction regarding an issue with Juror No. 1 at the time Juror No. 11 was replaced.)
DOJ-OGR-00009417.jpg
Quote #1
"No. I continued to believe that Juror No. 1 was who she said she was. That didn't occur to me, no."Source
— THE WITNESS
(The witness's response to the court's question about why they did not raise the issue concerning Juror No. 1.)
DOJ-OGR-00009417.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,431 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 616-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 128 of 130
A-5813
A-5813
C2grdau4
Edelstein
356
1
THE COURT: No. My question is not whether it would
2
have come out. If it had not come out, if the Court had not
3
pressed your law firm and the government failed to raise the
4
issue, would your law firm have disclosed the information set
5
forth in the July 21 letter?
6
THE WITNESS: I don't know.
7
THE COURT: Did you ever have any discussion with
8
anyone in the firm about that?
9
THE WITNESS: I think that our, at least my, frame of
10
mind was that we didn't know they were the same person, so I
11
just didn't think that there was a waiver issue.
12
THE COURT: In the middle of jury deliberations, this
13
Court displaced Juror No. 11 because of a health emergency,
14
replaced him with an alternate after much discussion with
15
counsel and over the objection of the government, and directed
16
the jury to restart its jury deliberations. Did you give any
17
consideration at that time to raising the issue that you
18
discussed in the park on May 12 with Ms. Brune and Ms.
19
Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1?
20
THE WITNESS: No. I continued to believe that Juror
21
No. 1 was who she said she was. That didn't occur to me, no.
22
THE COURT: Any further inquiries?
23
MR. OKULA: May I follow up on one or two questions,
24
your Honor?
25
THE COURT: Yes.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
Edelstein
356
1
THE COURT: No. My question is not whether it would
2
have come out. If it had not come out, if the Court had not
3
pressed your law firm and the government failed to raise the
4
issue, would your law firm have disclosed the information set
5
forth in the July 21 letter?
6
THE WITNESS: I don't know.
7
THE COURT: Did you ever have any discussion with
8
anyone in the firm about that?
9
THE WITNESS: I think that our, at least my, frame of
10
mind was that we didn't know they were the same person, so I
11
just didn't think that there was a waiver issue.
12
THE COURT: In the middle of jury deliberations, this
13
Court displaced Juror No. 11 because of a health emergency,
14
replaced him with an alternate after much discussion with
15
counsel and over the objection of the government, and directed
16
the jury to restart its jury deliberations. Did you give any
17
consideration at that time to raising the issue that you
18
discussed in the park on May 12 with Ms. Brune and Ms.
19
Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1?
20
THE WITNESS: No. I continued to believe that Juror
21
No. 1 was who she said she was. That didn't occur to me, no.
22
THE COURT: Any further inquiries?
23
MR. OKULA: May I follow up on one or two questions,
24
your Honor?
25
THE COURT: Yes.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009417
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document