DOJ-OGR-00000211.tif

36.6 KB

Extraction Summary

1
People
13
Organizations
5
Locations
5
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document / court filing excerpt
File Size: 36.6 KB
Summary

This document is an excerpt from a legal filing, likely a brief or memo, discussing the limited scope of various agreements made by different United States Attorney's Offices and divisions of the Department of Justice. It references several legal cases, including United States v. Lafarge S.A., United States v. Goldfield, United States v. Ellison (likely Caroline Ellison), and United States v. Coccagna, providing case numbers, ECF filings, and dates, and notes the non-binding nature of these agreements on other federal, state, local, or foreign authorities.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Caroline Ellison Party in a plea agreement
Cited in an available plea agreement document

Organizations (13)

Name Type Context
Eastern District of New York USAO
United States Attorney's Office
NSD [National Security Division of the United States Department of Justice]
Division of the Department of Justice
United States Department of Justice
Federal government department
United States Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey
United States Attorney's Office
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York
Prosecuting authority
United States Attorney's Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
United States Attorney's Office
Criminal Division, Fraud Section
Part of the United States Department of Justice
United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Texas
United States Attorney's Office
Lafarge S.A.
Defendant in a legal case
Goldfield
Defendant in a legal case
Ellison
Defendant in a legal case (likely Caroline Ellison)
Coccagna
Defendant in a legal case
CNBC
Source of an online document

Timeline (5 events)

2016-12-22
ECF No. 39 filed in United States v. Goldfield, No. 1:16-cr-00513-JBS
2022-10-18
ECF No. 10 filed in United States v. Lafarge S.A., No. 1:22-cr-00444-WFK
2022-12-02
ECF No. 3-1 filed in United States v. Coccagna, No. 1:22-cr-00407-YK
2022-12-18
ECF No. 4 filed in United States v. Ellison, No. 22-CR-673 (RA)
2025-05-05
Accessed Caroline Ellison Plea Agreement document from CNBC website

Locations (5)

Location Context
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction, District of New Jersey
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction
Jurisdiction

Relationships (4)

United States Plaintiff-Defendant in legal case Lafarge S.A.
United States v. Lafarge S.A.
United States Plaintiff-Defendant in legal case Goldfield
United States v. Goldfield
United States Plaintiff-Defendant in legal case Ellison
United States v. Ellison
United States Plaintiff-Defendant in legal case Coccagna
United States v. Coccagna

Key Quotes (4)

"This agreement is limited to the United States Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey and cannot bind other federal, state, or local authorities."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000211.tif
Quote #1
"This Agreement does not bind any federal, state, or local prosecuting authority other than this Office."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000211.tif
Quote #2
"Nothing in this Agreement shall bind any other United States Attorney's Office, state prosecutor's office, or federal, state or local law enforcement agency."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000211.tif
Quote #3
"This agreement is limited to the United States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section and the United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Texas, and"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000211.tif
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,571 characters)

11
the Office [Eastern District of New York USAO], the
NSD [National Security Division of the United States
Department of Justice], and the Defendants, and does
not bind any other division or section of the Department
of Justice or any other federal, state, local or foreign
prosecuting, administrative or regulatory authority."
United States v. Lafarge S.A., No. 1:22-cr-00444-WFK,
ECF No. 10 (Oct. 18, 2022), at 3.
District of New Jersey: "This agreement is limited
to the United States Attorney's Office for the District of
New Jersey and cannot bind other federal, state, or local
authorities." United States v. Goldfield, No. 1:16-cr-00513-
JBS, ECF No. 39 (Dec. 22, 2016), at 4.
Southern District of New York: "This Agreement
does not bind any federal, state, or local prosecuting
authority other than this Office." United States v. Ellison,
No. 22-CR-673 (RA), at 4 (Dec. 18, 2022), at 4.2
Middle District of Pennsylvania: "Nothing in this
Agreement shall bind any other United States Attorney's
Office, state prosecutor's office, or federal, state or local
law enforcement agency." United States v. Coccagna, No.
1:22-cr-00407-YK, ECF No. 3-1 (Dec. 2, 2022), at 29.
Northern District of Texas. "This agreement is
limited to the United States Department of Justice,
Criminal Division, Fraud Section and the United States
Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Texas, and
2. Available at https://fm.cnbc.com/applications/cnbc.com/
resources/editorialfiles/2022/12/21/1671676065196-Caroline
Ellison_Plea_Agreement.pdf (accessed May 5, 2025).
DOJ-OGR-00000211

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document