DOJ-OGR-00014797.jpg
545 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
545 KB
Summary
This document is page 50 of a court transcript filed on August 22, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The text details a discussion between the Judge, defense attorney Mr. Everdell, and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding sentencing guidelines, specifically establishing an offense level of 36 and a guideline range of 188 to 235 months. The defense preserves an objection regarding the inclusion of Virginia and Melissa as separate offense groups.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Addressing the court regarding sentencing guidelines and preserving objections regarding victim grouping.
|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor (Government) |
Confirming guideline calculations and responding to the court.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, calculating offense levels and guideline ranges.
|
| Virginia | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned by defense counsel regarding grouping for sentencing calculations.
|
| Melissa | Victim/Witness |
Mentioned by defense counsel regarding grouping for sentencing calculations.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Indicated by document footer 'DOJ-OGR'
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-22
Court hearing/sentencing proceeding (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) discussing sentencing guidelines and offense levels.
Southern District of New York (implied by reporter name)
Relationships (2)
Discussed together regarding 'separate groups' for sentencing offense levels.
Everdell answering questions and preserving objections to the Court's rulings.
Key Quotes (4)
"highest total offense level, increase by 4 from 32 to 36."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014797.jpg
Quote #1
"guideline range 188 to 235."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014797.jpg
Quote #2
"add Virginia and Melissa as separate groups, so we do object to that."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014797.jpg
Quote #3
"We don't think the record is adequate to make them separate offense groups."Source
DOJ-OGR-00014797.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,329 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 50 of 101 50
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
1 the table is more than 5, as 5 levels. And, thus, the total
2 number would be 36.
3 THE COURT: I presume you agree with that,
4 Mr. Everdell?
5 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Under the 2003 manual -- I see. The
7 highest total offense level, increase by 4 from 32 to 36.
8 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.
9 THE COURT: Thank you, Ms. Moe. And that produces a
10 guideline range 188 to 235.
11 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
12 MR. EVERDELL: We agree with that, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: Thank you. Same question to you,
14 Mr. Everdell. Preserving your objections, of course, but
15 anything new based on what I said?
16 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. I don't think because
17 the government's response was the one added their request to
18 add Virginia and Melissa as separate groups, so we do object to
19 that. I know the Court has already ruled on that. We don't
20 think the record is adequate to make them separate offense
21 groups. I understand the Court has already ruled on that, but
22 we would like to preserve that objection.
23 THE COURT: Understood. Thank you.
24 Do you want to respond, Ms. Moe?
25 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I think the Court's rulings
2 number would be 36.
3 THE COURT: I presume you agree with that,
4 Mr. Everdell?
5 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Under the 2003 manual -- I see. The
7 highest total offense level, increase by 4 from 32 to 36.
8 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.
9 THE COURT: Thank you, Ms. Moe. And that produces a
10 guideline range 188 to 235.
11 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
12 MR. EVERDELL: We agree with that, your Honor.
13 THE COURT: Thank you. Same question to you,
14 Mr. Everdell. Preserving your objections, of course, but
15 anything new based on what I said?
16 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. I don't think because
17 the government's response was the one added their request to
18 add Virginia and Melissa as separate groups, so we do object to
19 that. I know the Court has already ruled on that. We don't
20 think the record is adequate to make them separate offense
21 groups. I understand the Court has already ruled on that, but
22 we would like to preserve that objection.
23 THE COURT: Understood. Thank you.
24 Do you want to respond, Ms. Moe?
25 MS. MOE: Your Honor, I think the Court's rulings
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
.
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014797
.
.
.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014797
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document