DOJ-OGR-00018914.jpg
469 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
469 KB
Summary
This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between prosecutor Ms. Moe and the Judge regarding the admissibility of testimony concerning a person named Amanda. The Judge sustains an objection regarding the testimony, noting that previous testimony established a belief that the individual was 17 years old.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor/Government Attorney |
Arguing regarding the admissibility of testimony concerning an individual named Amanda.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Ruling on an objection regarding the classification of evidence and testimony.
|
| Amanda | Potential Victim/Subject of Testimony |
Mentioned by the prosecution; they state they do not intend to argue she is an 'additional victim' at closing.
|
| Shawn | Witness |
Name appears in the header 'Shawn - direct', indicating this sidebar/discussion occurred during or regarding the dire...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Implied by footer code DOJ-OGR
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied jurisdiction based on case number format and court reporter.
|
Key Quotes (4)
"We don't intend to argue at closing that there's an additional victim Amanda."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018914.jpg
Quote #1
"This is being offered as direct evidence as corroborative testimony of the account of the victims here."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018914.jpg
Quote #2
"The testimony yesterday was she believes she was 17."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018914.jpg
Quote #3
"Sustained."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018914.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,063 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 52 of 262 1757
LC8VMAX2 Shawn - direct
LC8VMAX2 Shawn - direct
1 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the disclosure
2 question, I just wanted to note, the issue for disclosure was
3 who the government would be arguing at trial were the victims
4 here. We don't intend to argue at closing that there's an
5 additional victim Amanda. This is being offered as direct
6 evidence as corroborative testimony of the account of the
7 victims here.
8 THE COURT: Well, direct evidence only if you're
9 suggesting she's a victim of the conspiracy. So that would
10 violate that order. And it's corroborative only if the age
11 matches up.
12 MS. MOE: Your Honor, our view is that it's direct
13 evidence because it corroborates her account of who she was
14 bringing.
15 THE COURT: Then what's the purpose of the -- sorry.
16 What's the purpose of the age?
17 The testimony yesterday was she believes she was 17.
18 Sustained.
19 (Continued on next page)
20
21
22
23
24
25
2 question, I just wanted to note, the issue for disclosure was
3 who the government would be arguing at trial were the victims
4 here. We don't intend to argue at closing that there's an
5 additional victim Amanda. This is being offered as direct
6 evidence as corroborative testimony of the account of the
7 victims here.
8 THE COURT: Well, direct evidence only if you're
9 suggesting she's a victim of the conspiracy. So that would
10 violate that order. And it's corroborative only if the age
11 matches up.
12 MS. MOE: Your Honor, our view is that it's direct
13 evidence because it corroborates her account of who she was
14 bringing.
15 THE COURT: Then what's the purpose of the -- sorry.
16 What's the purpose of the age?
17 The testimony yesterday was she believes she was 17.
18 Sustained.
19 (Continued on next page)
20
21
22
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018914
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document