This document is an email chain between USANYS employees on August 10, 2019, the morning of Jeffrey Epstein's death. The correspondents express shock and frustration at the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and MCC for allowing the suicide to occur, especially after a previous attempt two weeks prior. They simultaneously discuss legal strategies, specifically noting that while a general money judgment against the estate is likely impossible, civil forfeiture against specific properties might still be pursued depending on statutes of limitations.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| [Redacted] (USANYS) | Federal Prosecutor/Employee |
Sender of the top email; expresses confusion about how the suicide happened.
|
| [Redacted] (USANYS) 1 | Federal Prosecutor/Employee |
Participant in thread; expresses shock at MCC ('WTF?').
|
| [Redacted] (USANYS) 3 | Federal Prosecutor/Employee |
Participant in thread; discusses legal strategy regarding civil forfeiture and criticizes BOP.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant/Deceased |
Subject of the emails; referred to as 'Epstein', 'our defendant', and 'he'.
|
| Mark Epstein | Relative |
Referenced as 'living brother' in the context of the estate.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
"Incongruous Part B: MCC, WTF?"Source
"His victims deserve some sort of modicum of justice and this is not how it should have gone down."Source
"It's just slightly more awkward where he was somehow allowed to commit suicide on a second try in two weeks by a branch of our government."Source
"Not a great year for BOP in the New York area."Source
"We can bring a civil forfeiture against the properties IF we're within statute, which we may not be."Source
"We can't pursue any kind of general money judgment against the estate - there we're out of luck."Source
"I mean . . . Don't understand how this happened."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,144 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document