DOJ-OGR-00001445.jpg

623 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal brief / court filing (government memorandum)
File Size: 623 KB
Summary

This page from a legal filing (Case 21-770, dated May 27, 2021) outlines the Government's argument for the detention of Ghislaine Maxwell. It references three denied bail applications and details a specific hearing on July 14, 2020, where Judge Nathan ruled Maxwell a flight risk based on strong evidence and the nature of the offenses. The document highlights that the indictment is supported by three victim-witnesses, corroborated by flight records and diaries.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the bail hearing; denied bail three times; deemed a flight risk.
Judge Nathan District Court Judge
Presided over bail hearings; denied Maxwell's applications; issued detention order.
Three different victim-witnesses Witnesses
Provided detailed, credible testimony supporting the Indictment.
Two victims Witnesses
Provided statements during the July 14, 2020 bail hearing.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Government
Provided proffers and evidence opposing bail.
District Court
Venue where bail applications were made and denied.
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by footer DOJ-OGR).

Timeline (1 events)

2020-07-14
Bail hearing where Judge Nathan heard arguments and victim statements, ultimately ordering Maxwell detained.
District Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of the bail hearings.

Relationships (2)

Maxwell Legal (Defendant/Judge) Judge Nathan
Judge Nathan denied all three applications in careful and thorough decisions.
Victim-witnesses Witness/Prosecution Government
Government proffers rely on victim-witness testimony.

Key Quotes (4)

"the nature and circumstances of the offense here weigh in favor of detention"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001445.jpg
Quote #1
"[t]he government’s evidence at this early juncture of the case appears strong"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001445.jpg
Quote #2
"Maxwell’s history and characteristics demonstrate that she poses a risk of flight"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001445.jpg
Quote #3
"Each victim-witness’s testimony is not only corroborated by that of the other victim-witnesses, but also by the testimony of other witnesses and documentary evidence, including flight records, diary entries, and other evidence."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001445.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,481 characters)

Case 21-770, Document 73, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page5 of 24
10. As the Government has explained in oral and written proffers, the allegations in the Indictment are supported by the detailed, credible testimony of three different victim-witnesses. (See, e.g., Ex. A at 5; Ex. F at 9-10). Each victim-witness’s testimony is not only corroborated by that of the other victim-witnesses, but also by the testimony of other witnesses and documentary evidence, including flight records, diary entries, and other evidence. (See Ex. A at 5; Ex. F at 10-12).
11. Maxwell has made three separate bail applications to the District Court, each of which was thoroughly briefed. Judge Nathan denied all three applications in careful and thorough decisions.
12. First, after receiving extensive written submissions from the parties (Ex. A, B, C), Judge Nathan held a bail hearing on July 14, 2020, at which she heard lengthy oral argument and received statements from two victims. Judge Nathan ultimately ordered Maxwell detained on the basis of risk of flight and explained her reasoning in a detailed oral ruling. (Ex. D at 79-91). In reaching this decision, Judge Nathan found that “the nature and circumstances of the offense here weigh in favor of detention” (id. at 82), “[t]he government’s evidence at this early juncture of the case appears strong” (id.), and Maxwell’s history and characteristics demonstrate that she poses a risk of flight (id. at 83). Among other
5
DOJ-OGR-00001445

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document